Paper · 2014 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Microbiological attributes in a latosol in glyphosate application under water deficit conditions

Mario Zuffo Alan; Andr Petter Fabiano; Czar Azevedo Nbrega Jlio; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of glyphosate on soil microbial activity under appropriate and water deficit conditions. The factors consisted of four treatments with different Roundup Ready® soybean cultivars, two herbicidal treatments [glyphosate (1.080 and 1.800 g a.e. ha-1) + control] and two soil moisture treatments (appropriate and water deficit conditions), plus two soybean conventional varieties subject only to the soil moisture treatments. It was evaluated total organic carbon (TOC), basal respiration rate (CO2), microbial carbon biomass (MCB), metabolic quotient (qCO2), microbial quotient (qmic), nodule number (NN), and dry weight of nodules per plant (DWNP). Except for TOC, all other microbiological parameters were significantly influenced by the application of glyphosate, and the effects are more evident at a 1.800 g a.e. ha-1 dose in Roundup Ready® soybean cultivars associated to water deficit condition. The soil microbiota stability was favored by the absence of glyphosate application and water deficit condition on soil. MCB and qCO2 showed to be quite sensitive to changes resulting from the use of glyphosate. In general, in conventional cultivars there was lesser effect of water deficit conditions on the microbiological attributes, when compared to treatments with glyphosate application under the same conditions. Key words: Glycine max (L.) Merrill, inhibitors of the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPs), microbiota, Roundup Ready® soybean seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate significantly influenced microbial parameters other than total organic carbon, especially at the higher dose with water deficit.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
application of glyphosatee0
Outcome
microbiological parameterse0
Qualifier
1.800 g a.e. ha-1 dose in Roundup Ready® soybean cultivars associated to water deficit conditione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for TOC, all other microbiological parameters were significantly influenced by the application of glyphosate, and the effects are more evident at a 1.800 g a.e. ha-1 dose in Roundup Ready® soybean cultivars associated to water deficit condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbiota stability was favored without glyphosate and under water deficit.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
absence of glyphosate application and water deficit conditione0
Outcome
soil microbiota stabilitye0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil microbiota stability was favored by the absence of glyphosate application and water deficit condition on soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean conventional varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial carbon biomass and metabolic quotient were sensitive to glyphosate-associated changes.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
MCB and qCO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MCB and qCO2 showed to be quite sensitive to changes resulting from the use of glyphosate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“two soybean conventional varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional cultivars showed a lesser water deficit effect on microbial attributes than glyphosate-treated cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
conventional cultivarse0
Treatment
water deficit conditionse0
Outcome
microbiological attributese0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
treatments with glyphosate application under the same conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, in conventional cultivars there was lesser effect of water deficit conditions on the microbiological attributes, when compared to treatments with glyphosate application under the same conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean conventional varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–430 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.