Paper · 1963 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Laboratory Evaluation of Several Chemical Protectants Against the Southern Cowpea Weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis, on Stored Dried Beans in Korea

Yong Ho Bang

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted to compare the effectiveness of emulsifiable and dust formulations of Bayer 29493 (O,O-dimethyl 0-[4-(methylthio)-m-tolyl] phosphorothioate), Pyrenone Grain Protectant® (0.08% pyrethrins, 1.20% piperonyl butoxide), Dipterex® (O,O-dimethyl 2,2,2-trichloro-lhydroxyethyl phosphonate) and agricultural grade malathion as protectants for small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Where direct comparisons permitted, the emulsifiables proved generally more effective than the dusts. Bayer 29493 emulsifiable as low as 4 ppm gave longer and better protection than other materials. Malathion EC at 4 ppm and Bayer 29493 dust at 16 ppm were second in general efficacy. Pyrenone Grain Protectant dusts containing 1.6 and 2.4 ppm pyrethrins and 24 and 36 ppm piperonyl butoxide in one trial compared favorably with Bayer 29493 EC at 4 ppm and malathion EC at 2 and 4 ppm 30 days after application. While Bayer 29493 EC, malathion EC and Pyrenone Grain Protectant dust show promise against C. chinensis, more trails over longer periods must be undertaken to evaluate their usefulness fully. Viability in the beans from the less effective treatments was low, probably owing to extensive weevil damage rather than to phytotoxicity resulting from the insecticide. Washing the beans immediately after treating with Bayer 29492 EC and malathion EC and Pyrcnone Grain Protectant dust and again at 30 days greatly reduced the efficacy of the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emulsifiable formulations were generally more effective protectants than dust formulations.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
emulsifiablese1
Interactor
Callosobruchus chinensisCallosobruchus chinensise0pest
Outcome
effectivee1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
dustse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus chinensis
Callosobruchus chinensis · InteractorUdo Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“Where direct comparisons permitted, the emulsifiables proved generally more effective than the dusts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bayer 29493 emulsifiable at 4 ppm gave longer and better protection than other materials.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
Bayer 29493 emulsifiable as low as 4 ppme2
Interactor
Callosobruchus chinensisCallosobruchus chinensise0pest
Outcome
longer and better protectione2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
other materialse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus chinensis
Callosobruchus chinensis · InteractorUdo Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bayer 29493 emulsifiable as low as 4 ppm gave longer and better protection than other materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–653 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malathion EC at 4 ppm and Bayer 29493 dust at 16 ppm were second in general efficacy.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
Malathion EC at 4 ppm and Bayer 29493 dust at 16 ppme3
Interactor
Callosobruchus chinensisCallosobruchus chinensise0pest
Outcome
general efficacye3
Direction
seconde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus chinensis
Callosobruchus chinensis · InteractorUdo Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“Malathion EC at 4 ppm and Bayer 29493 dust at 16 ppm were second in general efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrenone Grain Protectant dusts compared favorably with Bayer 29493 EC at 4 ppm and malathion EC at 2 and 4 ppm in one trial.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
Pyrenone Grain Protectant dusts containing 1.6 and 2.4 ppm pyrethrins and 24 and 36 ppm piperonyl butoxidee4
Interactor
Callosobruchus chinensisCallosobruchus chinensise0pest
Outcome
compared favorablye4
Direction
favorablye4
Comparator
Bayer 29493 EC at 4 ppm and malathion EC at 2 and 4 ppme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus chinensis
Callosobruchus chinensis · InteractorUdo Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pyrenone Grain Protectant dusts containing 1.6 and 2.4 ppm pyrethrins and 24 and 36 ppm piperonyl butoxide in one trial compared favorably with Bayer 29493 EC at 4 ppm and malathion EC at 2 and 4 ppm 30 days after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–966 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean viability was low for the less effective treatments, probably owing to weevil damage rather than phytotoxicity.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
less effective treatmentse5
Outcome
Viability in the beanse5
Direction
lowe5
Qualifier
probably owing to extensive weevil damagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e5

“Viability in the beans from the less effective treatments was low, probably owing to extensive weevil damage rather than to phytotoxicity resulting from the insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing the beans after treatment greatly reduced the efficacy of the treatments.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
Washing the beanse6
Outcome
efficacy of the treatmentse6
Direction
greatly reducede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e6

“Washing the beans immediately after treating with Bayer 29492 EC and malathion EC and Pyrcnone Grain Protectant dust and again at 30 days greatly reduced the efficacy of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1514 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bayer 29493 EC, malathion EC and Pyrenone Grain Protectant dust show promise against Callosobruchus chinensis.

Taxon
Phaseolus angularisVigna angularise0
Treatment
Bayer 29493 EC, malathion EC and Pyrenone Grain Protectant duste7
Interactor
C. chinensisCallosobruchus chinensise7pest
Outcome
show promise against C. chinensise7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna angularis
Vigna angularis · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus chinensis
Callosobruchus chinensis · InteractorUdo Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small red beans (Phaseolus angularis) from damage by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–454 · show in text ↑
e7

“While Bayer 29493 EC, malathion EC and Pyrenone Grain Protectant dust show promise against C. chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1071 · show in text ↑