Paper · 1986 · Hilgardia

Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton: II. A strategic management model

N. D. Stone; A. P. Gutierrez

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

I. A Field-Oriented Simulation Model A simulation model for pink bollworm (PBW) and cotton was developed, field validated, and incorporated into an industry sponsored regional PBW management program for southwestern desert cotton. The PBW model differs from earlier versions in its incorporation of stochastic development, the expansion of the concept of physiological time to include nutritional influences of the cotton host on larval development, and its ability to simulate the kinds of data typically collected by pest control advisors when monitoring cotton for pink bollworm. II. A Strategic Management Model A simulation model of pink bollworm populations, as affected by insecticide and pheromone applications in cotton, is described. The simulation results compared favorably to field data. The study indicates that use of sex pheromone for control of pink bollworm by mating disruption inversely depends on density and therefore is most effective in the early season when populations are low. Compared to untreated fields, pheromone-treated fields show delayed population peaks and reduced overall infestation. Pheromone applications in the early season delay but do not obviate the need to spray insecticide to limit infestation levels. III. Strategies for Control: An Economic Simulation Study The cotton-pink bollworm model and the management model developed by Stone and Gutierrez (I and II of this series) are used to evaluate different strategies for controlling pink bollworm in the southwestern desert. Pesticide sprays based on an ultraconservative economic threshold of 2 percent infested bolls are found to be the most profitable in the absence of penalties for heavy insecticide use. Insecticide sprayed on thresholds over 8 percent infested bolls did not control pink bollworm. Pheromone in combination with insecticide greatly enhanced profits and was the best workable strategy tested since a 2 percent threshold is probably too difficult to sample accurately in the field. The efficacy of using early season insecticide applications at and before the first hostable squares are present is discussed, as is the possible impact of early season insecticide applications on beneficial insect populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pink bollworm–cotton simulation model was field validated and incorporated into regional management.

Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
field validatede0
Comparator
regional PBW management programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A simulation model for pink bollworm (PBW) and cotton was developed, field validated, and incorporated into an industry sponsored regional PBW management program for southwestern desert cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–230 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The PBW model added stochastic development, nutritional influences of cotton on larvae, and simulation of advisor monitoring data.

Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
ability to simulate the kinds of data typically collected by pest control advisorse0
Comparator
earlier versionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PBW model differs from earlier versions in its incorporation of stochastic development, the expansion of the concept of physiological time to include nutritional influences of the cotton host on larval development, and its ability to simulate the kinds of data typically collected by pest control advisors when monitoring cotton for pink bollworm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–582 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated pink bollworm populations compared favorably with field data.

Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
simulation resultse0
Direction
compared favorablye0
Comparator
field datae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The simulation results compared favorably to field data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“A simulation model of pink bollworm populations, as affected by insecticide and pheromone applications in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–728 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Mating disruption with sex pheromone was more effective at low early season pink bollworm density.

Treatment
sex pheromonee0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
control of pink bollworm by mating disruptione0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
early season when populations are lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of sex pheromone for control of pink bollworm by mating disruption inversely depends on density and therefore is most effective in the early season when populations are low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone treatment delayed pink bollworm population peaks compared with untreated fields.

Treatment
pheromone-treated fieldse0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
population peakse0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
untreated fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to untreated fields, pheromone-treated fields show delayed population peaks and reduced overall infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“pink bollworm populations, as affected by insecticide and pheromone applications in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone treatment reduced overall pink bollworm infestation compared with untreated fields.

Treatment
pheromone-treated fieldse0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
overall infestatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to untreated fields, pheromone-treated fields show delayed population peaks and reduced overall infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“pink bollworm populations, as affected by insecticide and pheromone applications in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–728 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early season pheromone delayed but did not remove the need for insecticide to limit infestation.

Treatment
Pheromone applications in the early seasone0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
need to spray insecticide to limit infestation levelse0
Direction
do not obviatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pheromone applications in the early season delay but do not obviate the need to spray insecticide to limit infestation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“pink bollworm populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays triggered at a 2 percent infested-boll threshold were most profitable without penalties for heavy insecticide use.

Treatment
Pesticide sprays based on an ultraconservative economic threshold of 2 percent infested bollse0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
most profitablee0
Direction
most profitablee0
Qualifier
in the absence of penalties for heavy insecticide usee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pesticide sprays based on an ultraconservative economic threshold of 2 percent infested bolls are found to be the most profitable in the absence of penalties for heavy insecticide use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–229 · show in text ↑
e2

“pink bollworm in the southwestern desert”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide thresholds above 8 percent infested bolls failed to control pink bollworm.

Treatment
Insecticide sprayed on thresholds over 8 percent infested bollse0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
control pink bollworme0
Direction
did not controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticide sprayed on thresholds over 8 percent infested bolls did not control pink bollworm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Combining pheromone with insecticide greatly increased profits.

Treatment
Pheromone in combination with insecticidee0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pheromone in combination with insecticide greatly enhanced profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1868 · show in text ↑
e1

“southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–229 · show in text ↑
e2

“pink bollworm in the southwestern desert”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1520 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The pheromone and insecticide combination was the best workable tested strategy because a 2 percent threshold was probably hard to sample accurately.

Treatment
Pheromone in combination with insecticidee1
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae3pest
Outcome
best workable strategy testede0
Qualifier
2 percent threshold is probably too difficult to sample accurately in the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was the best workable strategy tested since a 2 percent threshold is probably too difficult to sample accurately in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1999 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pheromone in combination with insecticide greatly enhanced profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1868 · show in text ↑
e2

“southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–229 · show in text ↑
e3

“pink bollworm in the southwestern desert”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1520 · show in text ↑

pheromone · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

infection · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Untreated infestations caused significant yield losses versus insecticide treatment from first boll formation.

    Pink Bollworm Suppression Through Crop Termination12 · 1978 · compared with treated with insecticides on schedule from the time of 1 st boll formation

    Opposite direction

See all 3 papers →

application · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.