Paper · 2016 · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Segmentation of Pollen Tube Growth Videos Using Dynamic Bi-Modal Fusion and Seam Carving

Asongu L. Tambo; Bir Bhanu

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth of pollen tubes is of significant interest in plant cell biology, as it provides an understanding of internal cell dynamics that affect observable structural characteristics such as cell diameter, length, and growth rate. However, these parameters can only be measured in experimental videos if the complete shape of the cell is known. The challenge is to accurately obtain the cell boundary in noisy video images. Usually, these measurements are performed by a scientist who manually draws regions-of-interest on the images displayed on a computer screen. In this paper, a new automated technique is presented for boundary detection by fusing fluorescence and brightfield images, and a new efficient method of obtaining the final cell boundary through the process of Seam Carving is proposed. This approach takes advantage of the nature of the fusion process and also the shape of the pollen tube to efficiently search for the optimal cell boundary. In video segmentation, the first two frames are used to initialize the segmentation process by creating a search space based on a parametric model of the cell shape. Updates to the search space are performed based on the location of past segmentations and a prediction of the next segmentation.Experimental results show comparable accuracy to a previous method, but significant decrease in processing time. This has the potential for real time applications in pollen tube microscopy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed pollen tube segmentation method had accuracy comparable to an earlier method.

Taxon
Pollen Tubet0
Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
a previous methode0

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental results show comparable accuracy to a previous method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pollen Tube Growth Videos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed pollen tube segmentation method significantly reduced processing time relative to an earlier method.

Taxon
Pollen Tubet0
Outcome
processing timee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
a previous methode1

Verbatim

e0

“but significant decrease in processing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparable accuracy to a previous method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pollen Tube Growth Videos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–41 · show in text ↑