Paper · 1999 · Journal of Agricultural Meteorology

An Automatic Irrigation System for Direct Seeding Rice Cultivation.

Kimio INOUE; Kou NAKAZONO; Hiromitsu KANNO

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

As reported by many agronomists, the direct seeding cultivation of rice is thought to be an effective way to reduce the cost of rice production in Japan. However, the rice yield of direct seeding cultivation is generally lower and unstable compared with that from transplanting cultivation. This is mainly due to the unstable establishment of rice seedlings and slow growth during the early growing stage. The two reasons mentioned above are correlated with an appropriate control of water depth under changing weather conditions.This report describes an automatic irrigation system based on the rice microclimate prediction model (Inoue, 1985). This irrigation system can appropriately control water depth and accordingly the microclimate of direct seeding rice fields using weather data and rice plant data. The feasibility tests of this system were done at two direct seeding rice fields at Yuza-machi, Yamagata Prefecture in 1995 and at Yawara-mura, Ibaraki Prefecture in 1997, respectively.The results obtained from the above two experiments can be summarized as follows:The newly developed automatic irrigation system showed good performance in controlling the water depth of direct seeding rice fields during the whole rice growing season. The brown rice yield from the field controlled by this system was 562kg/10a, while neighboring direct seeding rice fields, in which the water depth was controlled manuall, had yields of 492kg/10a and 505kg/10a in 1997. The plant height of the test field with the automatic irrigation system was about 75cm, compared to about 70cm in neighboring direct seeding cultures.These results show that the newly developed automatic irrigation system was effective in stabilizing the establishment and emergence of rice seedlings, and in promoting subsequent growth in direct seeding cultures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system controlled water depth well through the rice season.

Outcome
controlling the water depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“newly developed automatic irrigation system showed good performance in controlling the water depth of direct seeding rice fields during the whole rice growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Automatic irrigation yielded 562kg/10a versus 492kg/10a and 505kg/10a in manually controlled neighboring fields.

Treatment
controlled by this systeme0
Outcome
brown rice yielde0
Value
562kg/10ae0
Qualifier
492kg/10a and 505kg/10ae0
Comparator
water depth was controlled manualle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“brown rice yield from the field controlled by this system was 562kg/10a, while neighboring direct seeding rice fields, in which the water depth was controlled manuall, had yields of 492kg/10a and 505kg/10a in 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height under automatic irrigation was about 75cm versus about 70cm in neighboring direct-seeded fields.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
automatic irrigation systeme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
about 75cme0
Qualifier
about 70cme0
Comparator
neighboring direct seeding culturese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“plant height of the test field with the automatic irrigation system was about 75cm, compared to about 70cm in neighboring direct seeding cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1615 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system stabilized rice seedling establishment and emergence.

Outcome
establishment and emergencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“newly developed automatic irrigation system was effective in stabilizing the establishment and emergence of rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1766 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system promoted subsequent growth in direct-seeded rice.

Outcome
subsequent growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoting subsequent growth in direct seeding cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.