Abstract
During 1965 and 1966, low-volume (LV) concentrate formulations of several insecticides or insecticide mixtures were evaluated for control of the bollworm, Heliothis (Boddie), and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman. Eight LV formulations and 3 waterdiluted emulsifiable concentrates were applied to 15 to 25-acre un replicated plots with a Piper PA18A®-type aircraft equipped with conventional boom, LV boom, and Micronair Rotary Atomizer® application systems. The Experiment was designed to compare the effectiveness of the LV materials with that of a standard treatment. Results in 1965 showed that the LV concentrate of the insecticides commonly recommended gave adequate control. These materials performed as well as the standard treatment. The undiluted materials that did not give satisfactory results at the rates used were Azodrin® (3-hydroxy-N-methyl-cis-crotonamide dimethyl phosphate), azinphosmethyl, malathion-Abate® (O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate O,O-diester with 4,4 thiodiphenol), malathion, and diazinon. In 1966, similar tests were conducted using essentially those materials found to be satisfactory in 1965. Results revealed that all the L V materials gave satisfactory control and were as effective as the standard treatment. Strobane ®(terpine polychlorinates (65% chlorine))-DDTmethyl parathion and Strobane-methyl parathion, both applied at ½ gal. of concentrate/acre, appeared to be slightly more effective than the standard water-diluted treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
In 1965, low-volume concentrates of commonly recommended insecticides gave adequate control of bollworm and boll weevil in cotton and performed as well as the standard treatment.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- LV concentratee5
- Second interactor
- Anthonomus grandis
Anthonomus grandise0pest - Outcome
- controle5
- Direction
- performed as well ase1
- Comparator
- standard treatmente1
HeliothisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“the LV concentrate of the insecticides commonly recommended gave adequate control”
e1“These materials performed as well as the standard treatment”
e0“the bollworm, Heliothis (Boddie), and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman”
t0“Cotton-Insect Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Undiluted Azodrin, azinphosmethyl and malathion-Abate did not give satisfactory results at the rates used.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- undiluted materialse2
- Second interactor
- Anthonomus grandisAnthonomus grandise0pest
- Outcome
- satisfactory resultse2
- Direction
- did not givee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The undiluted materials that did not give satisfactory results at the rates used were Azodrin®”
e4“azinphosmethyl, malathion-Abate®”
e0“the bollworm, Heliothis (Boddie), and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman”
t0“Cotton-Insect Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Undiluted malathion and diazinon did not give satisfactory results at the rates used.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- undiluted materialse2
- Outcome
- satisfactory resultse2
- Direction
- did not givee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The undiluted materials that did not give satisfactory results at the rates used were Azodrin®”
e3“malathion, and diazinon”
t0“Cotton-Insect Control”
Claim · model-written summary
In 1966, all low-volume materials gave satisfactory control and were as effective as the standard treatment.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- L V materialse6
- Outcome
- satisfactory controle6
- Direction
- as effective ase6
- Comparator
- standard treatmente6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“all the L V materials gave satisfactory control and were as effective as the standard treatment”
t0“Cotton-Insect Control”
Claim · model-written summary
Strobane-methyl parathion applied at ½ gal. of concentrate/acre appeared slightly more effective than the standard water-diluted treatment.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Strobane-methyl parathione6
- Outcome
- effectivee7
- Direction
- slightly more effectivee7
- Comparator
- standard water-diluted treatmente7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Strobane-methyl parathion, both applied at ½ gal. of concentrate/acre”
e7“appeared to be slightly more effective than the standard water-diluted treatment”
t0“Cotton-Insect Control”