Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Appraisal of wheat germplasm for adult plant resistance against stripe rust

Kamran Saleem; Hafiz M. Imran Arshad; Sajid Shokat; et al.

19
claims
36
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The resurgence of wheat stripe rust is of great concern for world food security. Owing to resistance breakdown and the appearance of new virulent high-temperature adapted races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), many high yielding commercial varieties in the country lost their yield potential. Searching for new sources of resistance is the best approach to mitigate the problem. Quantitative resistance (partial or adult plant) or durable resistance is reported to be more stable than race specific resistance. In the current perusal, a repertoire of 57 promising wheat lines along with the KLcheck line Morocco, developed through hybridisation and selection of local and international lines with International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) origin, were evaluated under natural field conditions at Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB) during the 2012−2013 and 2013−2014 time periods. Final rust severity (FRS), the area under the rust progress curve (AURPC), the relative area under the rust progress curve (rAURPC), and the coefficient of infection (CI) were unraveled to infer the level of quantitative resistance. Final rust severity was recorded when the susceptible check exhibited 100% severity. There were 21 lines which were immune (no disease), 16 which were resistant, five moderately resistant, two resistant-to-moderately resistant, one moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptible, 5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response. Nevertheless, 51 lines exhibited a high level of partial resistance while the three lines, NW-5-1212-1, NW-7-30-1, and NW-7-5 all showed a moderate level of partial resistance based on FRS, while 54 lines, on the basis of AURPC and rAURPC, were identified as conferring a high level of partial resistance. Moreover, adult plant resistance was conferred by 47 wheat lines, based on CI value. It was striking that, 13 immune lines among 21 were derived from parents of CIMMYT origin. Cluster analysis was executed to determine the diversity among the wheat genotypes based on stripe rust resistance and yield parameters. All genotypes were grouped into nine clusters exhibiting a high level of diversity at a 25% linkage distance. There were 29 wheat lines resistant to stripe rust that were grouped into the first three clusters, while 4 high-yielding lines were in Cluster VIII. The susceptible check, Morocco, was separated from rest of lines and fell in the last cluster i.e. Cluster IX. Based on the results, inter-crossing immune/ resistant lines is recommended, and with high yielding lines − it is also recommended that cultivars with improved disease resistance and yield potential be developed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-one wheat lines were immune to stripe rust.

Outcome
immune (no disease)e0
Value
21 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 21 lines which were immune (no disease), 16 which were resistant, five moderately resistant, two resistant-to-moderately resistant, one moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptible, 5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixteen wheat lines were resistant.

Outcome
resistante0
Value
16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 21 lines which were immune (no disease), 16 which were resistant, five moderately resistant, two resistant-to-moderately resistant, one moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptible, 5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five lines were moderately resistant.

Outcome
moderately resistante0
Value
fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 21 lines which were immune (no disease), 16 which were resistant, five moderately resistant, two resistant-to-moderately resistant, one moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptible, 5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two lines were resistant to moderately resistant.

Outcome
resistant-to-moderately resistante0
Value
twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 21 lines which were immune (no disease), 16 which were resistant, five moderately resistant, two resistant-to-moderately resistant, one moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptible, 5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One line was moderately resistant to moderately susceptible.

Outcome
moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptiblee0
Value
onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one moderately resistant-to-moderately susceptible, 5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five lines were moderately susceptible to susceptible.

Outcome
moderately susceptible-to-susceptiblee0
Value
5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5 moderately susceptible-to-susceptible, one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One line was moderately susceptible.

Outcome
moderately susceptiblee0
Value
onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one moderately susceptible, and six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six lines were susceptible.

Outcome
susceptible responsee0
Value
sixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six exhibited a susceptible response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty-one lines showed high partial resistance by final rust severity.

Outcome
high level of partial resistancee0
Value
51 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“51 lines exhibited a high level of partial resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three named lines had moderate partial resistance by final rust severity.

Material
NW-5-1212-1, NW-7-30-1, and NW-7-5e0
Outcome
moderate level of partial resistancee0
Value
three linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the three lines, NW-5-1212-1, NW-7-30-1, and NW-7-5 all showed a moderate level of partial resistance based on FRS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1748 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AURPC and rAURPC identified 54 lines with high partial resistance.

Outcome
high level of partial resistancee0
Value
54 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“54 lines, on the basis of AURPC and rAURPC, were identified as conferring a high level of partial resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CI showed adult plant resistance in 47 lines.

Outcome
adult plant resistancee0
Value
47 wheat linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult plant resistance was conferred by 47 wheat lines, based on CI value.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1876–1950 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirteen of 21 immune lines came from CIMMYT parents.

Outcome
immune linese0
Value
13 immune linese0
Qualifier
parents of CIMMYT origine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13 immune lines among 21 were derived from parents of CIMMYT origin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2041 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat genotypes formed nine diverse clusters at 25% linkage distance.

Outcome
nine clusterse0
Value
25% linkage distancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All genotypes were grouped into nine clusters exhibiting a high level of diversity at a 25% linkage distance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2288 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first three clusters contained 29 resistant wheat lines.

Outcome
resistant to stripe ruste0
Value
29 wheat linese0
Qualifier
first three clusterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were 29 wheat lines resistant to stripe rust that were grouped into the first three clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2387 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster VIII contained four high yielding lines.

Outcome
high-yielding linese0
Value
4e0
Qualifier
Cluster VIIIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 high-yielding lines were in Cluster VIII.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2395–2438 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The susceptible check Morocco separated into cluster IX.

Material
Moroccoe0
Outcome
Cluster IXe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The susceptible check, Morocco, was separated from rest of lines and fell in the last cluster i.e. Cluster IX.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2439–2549 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend intercrossing immune or resistant lines.

Outcome
inter-crossing immune/ resistant linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inter-crossing immune/ resistant lines is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2572–2625 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend developing cultivars with improved resistance and yield.

Outcome
cultivars with improved disease resistance and yield potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is also recommended that cultivars with improved disease resistance and yield potential be developed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2658–2762 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑