Paper · 1976 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Potential of Lixophaga diatraeae for Control of Diatraeae saccharalis in Louisiana124

R. M. McPherson; S. D. Hensley

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field releases of a tachinid parasite, Lixophaga diatraeae (Townsend), were made in July and September 1973 to evaluate its potential for suppressing populations of the sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.), in Louisiana. Sugarcane borer larval collections were obtained from the field every 2 wk to determine host density levels and percent parasitism. Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease host density. Sugarcane borer larval populations steadily increased to levels above that required to cause economic loss as the crop season progressed. Screen cage experiments were conducted from June through November 1974 to further evaluate the effectiveness of L. diatraeae. Parasitism was low following an August release; however, 8- to 9-day-old parasites were more efficient than those 5 days old. Percent parasitism of sugarcane borer larvae by L. diatraeae was higher following an October release than when releases were made in August. A significant positive correlation between percent parasitism and host population density was detected in screen cage experiments but not in the field test.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease sugarcane borer density.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Release of 1418 parasites/hae0
Interactor
Diatraea saccharalisDiatraea saccharalise1pest
Second interactor
Lixophaga diatraeaee2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
host densitye0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease host density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“a tachinid parasite, Lixophaga diatraeae (Townsend)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane borer larval populations rose above economically damaging levels as the crop season progressed.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Interactor
Sugarcane borerDiatraea saccharalise0pest
Outcome
Sugarcane borer larval populationse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane borer larval populations steadily increased to levels above that required to cause economic loss as the crop season progressed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–556 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism was low after the August release.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
Diatraea saccharalisDiatraea saccharalise1pest
Outcome
Parasitisme0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parasitism was low following an August release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight- to nine-day-old parasites were more efficient than five-day-old parasites.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
Diatraea saccharalisDiatraea saccharalise1pest
Second interactor
Lixophaga diatraeaee2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
more efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
those 5 days olde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8- to 9-day-old parasites were more efficient than those 5 days old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–807 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“a tachinid parasite, Lixophaga diatraeae (Townsend)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October releases produced higher parasitism of sugarcane borer larvae than August releases.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
October releasee0
Interactor
sugarcane borerDiatraea saccharalise0pest
Second interactor
L. diatraeaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Percent parasitism of sugarcane borer larvaee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
releases were made in Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent parasitism of sugarcane borer larvae by L. diatraeae was higher following an October release than when releases were made in August.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent parasitism correlated positively with host population density in screen cages.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
Diatraea saccharalisDiatraea saccharalise1pest
Outcome
percent parasitisme0
Direction
positivee0
Setting
screen cage experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant positive correlation between percent parasitism and host population density was detected in screen cage experiments but not in the field test.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The parasitism and host-density correlation was not detected in the field test.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
Diatraea saccharalisDiatraea saccharalise1pest
Outcome
correlation between percent parasitism and host population densitye0
Direction
not in the field teste0
Setting
field teste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diatraea saccharalis
Diatraea saccharalis · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“correlation between percent parasitism and host population density was detected in screen cage experiments but not in the field test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 · show in text ↑