Paper · 1988 · Journal of Applied Ecology

Defoliation and Burning Effects on the Tillering of Brachiaria decumbens

W. W. Stur; L. R. Humphreys

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

(1) Swards of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk were cut at 0 and 10 cm height and the cut material removed, or cut, field-dried and burnt 0, 4, or 8 days after cutting with a fuel load of 400 or 1600 g m-2. (2) Tillering was enhanced by cutting to ground level and removing surface residues, and by burning a light fuel load immediately after cutting. Seedling emergence was reduced in the 10 cm cut treatment where surface residues were retained. (3) Maximum temperature at soil surface was little affected by fuel load, but duration of temperature above 100 0C was increased by fuel load. (4) The utility of different systems of residue disposal directed to synchronizing tiller emergence and to maximizing tiller density in grass seed crops is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting Brachiaria decumbens to ground level and removing surface residues enhanced tillering compared with cutting at 10 cm height.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbenst0
Material
Basiliske1
Treatment
cutting to ground level and removing surface residuese2
Outcome
Tilleringe2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
10 cm heighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brachiaria decumbens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Swards of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk were cut at 0 and 10 cm height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tillering was enhanced by cutting to ground level and removing surface residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning a light fuel load immediately after cutting enhanced tillering of Brachiaria decumbens.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbenst0
Treatment
burning a light fuel load immediately after cuttinge3
Outcome
Tilleringe2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brachiaria decumbens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tillering was enhanced by cutting to ground level and removing surface residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–291 · show in text ↑
e3

“by burning a light fuel load immediately after cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling emergence of Brachiaria decumbens was reduced in the 10 cm cut treatment where surface residues were retained.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbenst0
Treatment
10 cm cut treatment where surface residues were retainede4
Outcome
Seedling emergencee4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brachiaria decumbens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seedling emergence was reduced in the 10 cm cut treatment where surface residues were retained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fuel load had little effect on the maximum soil surface temperature in Brachiaria decumbens swards.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbenst0
Treatment
fuel loade5
Outcome
Maximum temperature at soil surfacee5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brachiaria decumbens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum temperature at soil surface was little affected by fuel load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fuel load increased the duration of soil surface temperature above 100 0C in Brachiaria decumbens swards.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbenst0
Treatment
fuel loade6
Outcome
duration of temperature above 100 0Ce6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brachiaria decumbens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“duration of temperature above 100 0C was increased by fuel load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–590 · show in text ↑

fire · growth · Urochloa decumbensPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

light · growth · Urochloa decumbensPositive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.