Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Soil Conservation

Effect of multipurpose trees on growth and yield of ginger (Zingibar officinale Roscoe.) and turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) grown as intercrops in Arunachal Pradesh of North East India

V. K. Choudhary; Rajesh A. Alone; K.P. Mohapatra; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One of the most commonly adopted strategies for addressing environmental degradation in rural areas of the tropics is agroforestry. In and degraded land, plantation of fast growing multipurpose tree species play major role not only in rehabilitation of degraded lands but also increase the net productivity of these lands with proper crop tree combination. Keeping this in view, performance of two rhizomatous crops i.e., turmeric (Curcuma longa) and ginger (Zingibar officinale) was evaluated under rainfed conditions as sole crops and with 15-year old well established stands of forest tree species located at the research farm of ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Research Centre, Basar, Arunachal Pradesh. The average illumination below the canopies varied from 72.0 to 79.2% of incident radiation on turmeric and 71.7 to 78.8% of incident radiation on ginger. Turmeric and ginger were cultivated in the inter row spaces of 24 and 12 Multipurpose trees (MPTs), respectively. Turmeric and ginger did not perform well under as many as 18 and 5 MPTs, respectively. Turmeric, in association with nitrogen fixing tree species Alnus nepalensis and Parkia roxburghii did not significantly reduce its productivity. Leaf area and leaf area index (LAI) was significantly higher under A. nepalensis than the sole turmeric crop. However, MPTs had significantly negative effect on the growth and yield attributes of ginger crop. The reduction in yield of ginger ranged from 11.3 to 31.3%. It may be inferred that turmeric cultivation was more profitable than the ginger and both the crops showed highest benefit: cost ratio i.e., 3.10 and 2.36, respectively under A. nepalensis based agroforestry systems in comparison to the other MPT based agroforestry systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric performed poorly under 18 tree species.

Taxon
TurmericCurcuma longae0
Treatment
MPTse0
Outcome
performe0
Direction
did not perform welle0
Value
18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma longa
Curcuma longa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turmeric and ginger did not perform well under as many as 18 and 5 MPTs, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1069 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger performed poorly under five tree species.

Treatment
MPTse0
Outcome
performe0
Direction
did not perform welle0
Value
5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turmeric and ginger did not perform well under as many as 18 and 5 MPTs, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric productivity under Alnus nepalensis was not significantly reduced.

Taxon
TurmericCurcuma longae0
Treatment
Alnus nepalensise0
Interactor
Alnus nepalensisAlnus nepalensise0other
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma longa
Curcuma longa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alnus nepalensis
Alnus nepalensis · InteractorKrish Dulal · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turmeric, in association with nitrogen fixing tree species Alnus nepalensis and Parkia roxburghii did not significantly reduce its productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric productivity under Parkia roxburghii was not significantly reduced.

Taxon
TurmericCurcuma longae0
Treatment
Parkia roxburghiie0
Interactor
Parkia roxburghiiParkia roxburghiie0other
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma longa
Curcuma longa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parkia roxburghii
Parkia roxburghii · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turmeric, in association with nitrogen fixing tree species Alnus nepalensis and Parkia roxburghii did not significantly reduce its productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric leaf area and LAI were higher under A. nepalensis than sole crop.

Taxon
turmericCurcuma longae0
Treatment
A. nepalensise0
Interactor
A. nepalensisAlnus nepalensise0other
Outcome
Leaf area and leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole turmeric crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma longa
Curcuma longa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alnus nepalensis
Alnus nepalensis · InteractorKrish Dulal · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area and leaf area index (LAI) was significantly higher under A. nepalensis than the sole turmeric crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees negatively affected ginger growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
MPTse0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, MPTs had significantly negative effect on the growth and yield attributes of ginger crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger yield was reduced by 11.3–31.3%.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
11.3 to 31.3%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in yield of ginger ranged from 11.3 to 31.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1483 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric cultivation was more profitable than ginger.

Taxon
turmericCurcuma longae0
Outcome
profitablee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
gingere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma longa
Curcuma longa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It may be inferred that turmeric cultivation was more profitable than the ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1564 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric had its highest benefit-cost ratio under A. nepalensis at 3.10.

Taxon
turmericCurcuma longat0
Treatment
A. nepalensis based agroforestry systemse0
Interactor
A. nepalensisAlnus nepalensise0other
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.10e0
Comparator
other MPT based agroforestry systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma longa
Curcuma longa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alnus nepalensis
Alnus nepalensis · InteractorKrish Dulal · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the crops showed highest benefit: cost ratio i.e., 3.10 and 2.36, respectively under A. nepalensis based agroforestry systems in comparison to the other MPT based agroforestry systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“turmeric”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger had its highest benefit-cost ratio under A. nepalensis at 2.36.

Treatment
A. nepalensis based agroforestry systemse0
Interactor
A. nepalensisAlnus nepalensise0other
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.36e0
Comparator
other MPT based agroforestry systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Alnus nepalensis
Alnus nepalensis · InteractorKrish Dulal · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the crops showed highest benefit: cost ratio i.e., 3.10 and 2.36, respectively under A. nepalensis based agroforestry systems in comparison to the other MPT based agroforestry systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑