Paper · 2014

THE EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS DOSES ON CHICKPEA CULTIVARS UNDER RAINFALL CONDITIONS

Received September

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of different phosphorus doses (0, 15, 30, 40 and 70 kg ha -1 ) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars at Diyarbakir, Southeast Anatolia of Turkey over two years at late spring. The effect of phosphorus on plant height and number of branches plant-1 was non- significant. Number of branches plant-1 was different response to phosphorus doses, although statistically was not significant. Number of pods and seeds plant-1 were affected by phosphorus treatment. Although 100 seed weight was not affected by phosphorus applications, cultivar x doses interaction was important. Phosphorus doses were significant for yield, but yield apparently did not increase. Start dose, 15 kg phosphorus ha-1, was initially increased the yield, and 30 kg phosphorus ha-1 application slightly was increased. The highest number of pods and seeds at 30 and 70 kg P ha -1 , compared only one of these control and 15 kg P ha-1. Grain yield was increased to 16 and 12% with the application of 30 and 40 kg P ha -1 , respectively, when compared with control dose. Chickpea cultivars showed low response to P application. Phosphorus fertilization could not be effective due to late sown. Early sown and irrigation supply can be advisable for more effectiveness phosphorus intake in this region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had no significant effect on plant height or branch number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphoruse0
Outcome
plant height and number of branches plant-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of phosphorus on plant height and number of branches plant-1 was non- significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus treatment affected numbers of pods and seeds per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphorus treatmente0
Outcome
Number of pods and seeds plant-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of pods and seeds plant-1 were affected by phosphorus treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus applications did not affect 100 seed weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphorus applicationse0
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although 100 seed weight was not affected by phosphorus applications, cultivar x doses interaction was important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar by dose interaction was important for 100 seed weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
cultivare0
Treatment
dosese0
Outcome
100 seed weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although 100 seed weight was not affected by phosphorus applications, cultivar x doses interaction was important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus dose was significant for yield, although yield did not apparently increase overall.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Phosphorus dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus doses were significant for yield, but yield apparently did not increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg P ha -1, pod and seed numbers were highest.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30 and 70 kg P ha -1e0
Outcome
number of pods and seedse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control and 15 kg P ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of pods and seeds at 30 and 70 kg P ha -1 , compared only one of these control and 15 kg P ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg P ha -1 grain yield rose 16% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30 and 40 kg P ha -1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16e0
Comparator
control dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was increased to 16 and 12% with the application of 30 and 40 kg P ha -1 , respectively, when compared with control dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 kg P ha -1 grain yield rose 12% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30 and 40 kg P ha -1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
control dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was increased to 16 and 12% with the application of 30 and 40 kg P ha -1 , respectively, when compared with control dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivars showed low response to phosphorus application.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
low response to P applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea cultivars showed low response to P application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1149 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise earlier sowing and irrigation for more effective phosphorus intake in the region.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Early sown and irrigation supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sown and irrigation supply can be advisable for more effectiveness phosphorus intake in this region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 34–42 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 161 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.