Abstract
Correction: In the last line of the abstract, the word 'increase' was replaced with the word 'reduced' on 25th November 2015. The correct sentence now reads "The application of PRH, Calsol and Magic Growth significantly reduced rice yield than that obtained with recommended fertilizer dose."AbstractInherent soil fertility and application of exogenous fertilizer generally affect rice yield. Fertilization would be soil fertilization or foliar feeding through leaf area. Plant growth promoting substances also improve plant performance through modulation of its growth and yield. The study was conducted at BRAC Agricultural Research and Development Center (BARDC), Gazipur. The aim of the study was to find out the growth and yield of Boro rice as influenced by plant revitalization hormone (PRH) and liquid fertilizer Calsol and Magic Growth during dry season 2012-13 using randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatment consists of; T1=Recommend fertilizer dose of NPKS and Zn (Control), T2=T1+ recommended PRH, T3=T2 + half of the PRH, T4=Half of doses of T1 + PRH, T5=PRH, T6=Recommended fertilizer dose of NPK with three N top dressed along with Calsol, T7=Recommended fertilizer dose of NPK with 1st and 3rd split of N application and along with three split of Calsol application, T8=Recommended dose of liquid fertilizer Magic Growth. The effect of different treatment combinations of PRH and liquid fertilizer Calsol and Magic Growth showed significant difference (p<0.05) in panicle m-2, unfilled grain panicle-1, total grain panicle-1, and grain yield. However, none of the treatments out yielded the existing fertilizer application method. The application of PRH, Calsol and Magic Growth significantly reduced (corrected on 25th Nov. 2015) rice yield than that obtained with recommended fertilizer dose.Bangladesh Rice j. 2015, 19(1): 33-39
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment combinations significantly differed in four yield components.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- different treatment combinations of PRH and liquid fertilizer Calsol and Magic Growthe0
- Outcome
- panicle m-2, unfilled grain panicle-1, total grain panicle-1, and grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of different treatment combinations of PRH and liquid fertilizer Calsol and Magic Growth showed significant difference (p<0.05) in panicle m-2, unfilled grain panicle-1, total grain panicle-1, and grain yield.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
None of the treatments outyielded the existing fertilizer method.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- out yieldede0
- Direction
- out yieldede0
- Comparator
- existing fertilizer application methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“none of the treatments out yielded the existing fertilizer application method.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
PRH, Calsol and Magic Growth reduced rice yield versus recommended fertilizer dose.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- PRH, Calsol and Magic Growthe0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- recommended fertilizer dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of PRH, Calsol and Magic Growth significantly reduced (corrected on 25th Nov. 2015) rice yield than that obtained with recommended fertilizer dose.”
The same questions in other papers
class · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.