Paper · 2016 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of weed extracts against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) of mung bean

MA Ahad; MK Nahar; MR Amin; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The n-hexane extracts of the weeds ‘bhatpata’ Clerodendrum viscosum, ‘kashiature’ Cassia tora, ‘dhakishak’ Dryoptris filix-max, ‘bonmorich’ Croton bonpalandianum and ‘ghagra’ Xanthium strumarium were used to evaluate their effectiveness for suppressing pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis reared on mung bean Vigna radiata grains. The investigations were done with 1, 2 and 4% n-hexane extracts of the weeds and an untreated control. The weed extracts exhibited considerable effectiveness which varied with weed species, concentrations and exposure durations. The higher concentrations showed the higher rate of insect mortality, fecundity, adult emergence inhibition, and grain protection. The LC50 values of the extracts ranged from 5.3 to 7.8, 4.7 to 6.5 and 4.1 to 6.0 g/100 ml at 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment, respectively. The fecundity inhibition varied from 31.7 to 78.7%, adult emergence inhibition from 33.8 to 81.1%, and grain damage inhibition from 10.3 to 60.1% when ‘bhatpata’ with concentration of 1 g/100 ml and ‘ghagra’ with concentration of 4g/100 ml were applied, respectively. Among the tested weeds, ghagra (4g/100 ml) showed better efficacy against C. chinensis compared to other tested extracts and may be suggested to control pulse beetle and protection of mung bean grains.Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 41(1): 75-84, March 2016

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed extract effectiveness varied with species, concentration and exposure duration.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Qualifier
varied with weed species, concentrations and exposure durationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed extracts exhibited considerable effectiveness which varied with weed species, concentrations and exposure durations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher extract concentrations increased pulse beetle mortality.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
insect mortalitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher concentrations showed the higher rate of insect mortality, fecundity, adult emergence inhibition, and grain protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher extract concentrations increased fecundity inhibition.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
fecunditye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher concentrations showed the higher rate of insect mortality, fecundity, adult emergence inhibition, and grain protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher extract concentrations increased adult emergence inhibition.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
adult emergence inhibitione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher concentrations showed the higher rate of insect mortality, fecundity, adult emergence inhibition, and grain protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher extract concentrations increased grain protection.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
grain protectione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher concentrations showed the higher rate of insect mortality, fecundity, adult emergence inhibition, and grain protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract LC50 ranged from 5.3 to 7.8 g/100 ml at 24 hours.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
LC50 values of the extractse0
Value
5.3 to 7.8e0
Qualifier
24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LC50 values of the extracts ranged from 5.3 to 7.8, 4.7 to 6.5 and 4.1 to 6.0 g/100 ml at 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract LC50 ranged from 4.7 to 6.5 g/100 ml at 48 hours.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
LC50 values of the extractse0
Value
4.7 to 6.5e0
Qualifier
48e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LC50 values of the extracts ranged from 5.3 to 7.8, 4.7 to 6.5 and 4.1 to 6.0 g/100 ml at 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract LC50 ranged from 4.1 to 6.0 g/100 ml at 72 hours.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
LC50 values of the extractse0
Value
4.1 to 6.0 g/100 mle0
Qualifier
72 hours after treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LC50 values of the extracts ranged from 5.3 to 7.8, 4.7 to 6.5 and 4.1 to 6.0 g/100 ml at 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fecundity inhibition ranged from 31.7 to 78.7%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
fecundity inhibitione0
Value
31.7 to 78.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fecundity inhibition varied from 31.7 to 78.7%, adult emergence inhibition from 33.8 to 81.1%, and grain damage inhibition from 10.3 to 60.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult emergence inhibition ranged from 33.8 to 81.1%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
adult emergence inhibitione0
Value
33.8 to 81.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult emergence inhibition from 33.8 to 81.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain damage inhibition ranged from 10.3 to 60.1%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
grain damage inhibitione0
Value
10.3 to 60.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain damage inhibition from 10.3 to 60.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ghagra at 4g/100 ml was more effective against C. chinensis than other extracts.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
ghagra (4g/100 ml)e0
Interactor
C. chinensisCallosobruchus chinensise0pest
Outcome
efficacy against C. chinensise0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other tested extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus chinensis
Callosobruchus chinensis · InteractorUdo Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ghagra (4g/100 ml) showed better efficacy against C. chinensis compared to other tested extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ghagra to control pulse beetles and protect mung bean grain.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
ghagra (4g/100 ml)e0
Interactor
pulse beetlee0pest
Outcome
control pulse beetle and protection of mung bean grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ghagra (4g/100 ml) showed better efficacy against C. chinensis compared to other tested extracts and may be suggested to control pulse beetle and protection of mung bean grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1307 · show in text ↑