Abstract
The effects of drip irrigation and furrow irrigation on growth,yield,water consumption,and water productivity(WP)in the watermelon-cotton intercropping system were analyzed.The results showed that drip irrigation with mulch was better than furrow irrigation for the watermelon-cotton intercropping system.Compared to the furrow irrigation,the leaf area index of drip irrigation treatment was greater,whose irrigation amounts were reduced by 62.9mm in the symbiotic period for watermelon and129.9mm during the whole growth stage for cotton.The watermelon yield,cotton yield and WP under drip irrigation increased by 14.9%,9.2% and 40.39% compared to furrow irrigation,respectively.Drip irrigation with mulch had a greater advantage to develop agricultural production in the watermelon-cotton intercropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation produced a greater leaf area index than furrow irrigation.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatust0 - Treatment
- drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to the furrow irrigation,the leaf area index of drip irrigation treatment was greater”
t0“Watermelon”
Claim · model-written summary
Watermelon irrigation amount under drip irrigation was 62.9 mm less during the shared growth period.
- Taxon
- watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione1
- Outcome
- irrigation amountse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 62.9mme0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“whose irrigation amounts were reduced by 62.9mm in the symbiotic period for watermelon”
e1“Compared to the furrow irrigation,the leaf area index of drip irrigation treatment was greater,whose irrigation amounts were reduced by 62.9mm in the symbiotic period for watermelon and129.9mm during the whole growth stage for cotton.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton irrigation amount under drip irrigation was 129.9 mm less over its growth stage.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- drip irrigatione1
- Outcome
- irrigation amountse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 129.9mme0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“129.9mm during the whole growth stage for cotton”
e1“Compared to the furrow irrigation,the leaf area index of drip irrigation treatment was greater,whose irrigation amounts were reduced by 62.9mm in the symbiotic period for watermelon and129.9mm during the whole growth stage for cotton.”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation increased watermelon yield by 14.9% versus furrow irrigation.
- Taxon
- watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- watermelon yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14.9%e0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The watermelon yield,cotton yield and WP under drip irrigation increased by 14.9%,9.2% and 40.39% compared to furrow irrigation,respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation increased cotton yield by 9.2% versus furrow irrigation.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- cotton yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.2%e0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The watermelon yield,cotton yield and WP under drip irrigation increased by 14.9%,9.2% and 40.39% compared to furrow irrigation,respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation increased water productivity by 40.39% versus furrow irrigation.
- Taxon
- watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
- Treatment
- drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- WPe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 40.39%e0
- Comparator
- furrow irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The watermelon yield,cotton yield and WP under drip irrigation increased by 14.9%,9.2% and 40.39% compared to furrow irrigation,respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors favor drip irrigation with mulch for watermelon and cotton intercropping production.
Verbatim
e0“Drip irrigation with mulch had a greater advantage to develop agricultural production in the watermelon-cotton intercropping system.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →irrigation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
395 papers more in this group
See all 399 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.