Paper · 2010 · Shengtaixue zazhi

Effects of different tillage modes on soil properties and crop yield in a rain-fed field of Inner Mongolia

Kenneth Dean

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 4-year (2005-2008) field experiment was conducted on a typical slope field in Qingshuihe County of Inner Mongolia to study the effects of no tillage with low stubble (NL),no tillage with high stubble (NH),no tillage with low stubble and residues (NLS),no tillage with high stubble and residues (NHS),and conventional tillage (CT) on the soil properties and maize yield. No tillage increased soil microbial biomass C,N,and P,and soil organic matter and nutrient contents. In 2007 and 2008,the microbial biomass and the organic matter and nutrient contents in 0-10 cm soil layer were in order of NHSNLSNHNLCT. During the first three years of no tillage,maize yield was unstable; but in the 4th year,the yield was increased. Path analysis showed that soil total nitrogen,total phosphorus,available phosphorus,and especially microbial biomass carbon had direct effects on maize yield. The results indicated that no tillage was advantageous to the improvement of soil ecological environment and soil fertility in rain-fed farmlands of Inner Mongolia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass C,N,and Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tillage increased soil microbial biomass C,N,and P,and soil organic matter and nutrient contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–472 · show in text ↑
e1

“and maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased soil organic matter and nutrient contents.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
soil organic matter and nutrient contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tillage increased soil microbial biomass C,N,and P,and soil organic matter and nutrient contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–472 · show in text ↑
e1

“and maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–370 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2007 and 2008, topsoil microbial biomass, organic matter and nutrients ranked NHS, NLS, NH, NL and CT.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
microbial biomass and the organic matter and nutrient contentse0
Qualifier
0-10 cm soil layere0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2007 and 2008,the microbial biomass and the organic matter and nutrient contents in 0-10 cm soil layer were in order of NHSNLSNHNLCT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“and maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–370 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was unstable during the first three no-tillage years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Qualifier
first three years of no tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first three years of no tillage,maize yield was unstable;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield increased in the fourth year of no tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
no tillagee1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
4th yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but in the 4th year,the yield was increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“years of no tillage,maize yield was unstable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–677 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Path analysis found direct effects of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and microbial biomass carbon on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Qualifier
soil total nitrogen,total phosphorus,available phosphorus,and especially microbial biomass carbone0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Path analysis showed that soil total nitrogen,total phosphorus,available phosphorus,and especially microbial biomass carbon had direct effects on maize yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–882 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded no tillage improves soil ecology and fertility in rain-fed Inner Mongolia farmland.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
no tillage was advantageous to the improvement of soil ecological environment and soil fertilitye0
Setting
Inner Mongoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that no tillage was advantageous to the improvement of soil ecological environment and soil fertility in rain-fed farmlands of Inner Mongolia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“and maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–370 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.