Paper · 2011

Analysis of Cultivation Technological Mode of Maize in Close Planting High Yield and High Efficiency and Benefit Analysis

Wang Jun-he

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

According to the technological assemble of close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returned,promotion and demonstration in close planting high yield and high efficiency was formed in 3 trial points of Harbin.In 2010,the area of core demonstration accumulation reached 6 hm2,the area of demonstration accumulation reached 60 hm2,radicalization area of maize production achieved 6 000 hm2.Compared with the farmers' mode,it could increase yield 2 926 kg·hm-2,the difference was significant,and could reduce cost and increase benefit 0.27 billion yuan per year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstration area reached 6 hm2 in 2010.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
area of core demonstration accumulatione0
Value
6 hm2e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 2010,the area of core demonstration accumulation reached 6 hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wider demonstration area reached 60 hm2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
area of demonstration accumulatione0
Value
60 hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the area of demonstration accumulation reached 60 hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The radicalization area of maize production reached 6 000 hm2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
radicalization area of maize productione0
Value
6 000 hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radicalization area of maize production achieved 6 000 hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivation package significantly increased maize yield by 2 926 kg·hm-2 relative to farmers mode.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returnede0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
2 926 kg·hm-2e1
Comparator
farmers' modee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the farmers' mode,it could increase yield 2 926 kg·hm-2,the difference was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivation package reduced cost relative to farmers mode.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returnede0
Outcome
coste1
Direction
reducee1
Comparator
farmers' modee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the farmers' mode,it could increase yield 2 926 kg·hm-2,the difference was significant,and could reduce cost and increase benefit 0.27 billion yuan per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivation package increased annual benefit by 0.27 billion yuan relative to farmers mode.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returnede0
Outcome
benefite1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.27 billion yuan per yeare1
Comparator
farmers' modee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“close planting,subsoiling and fewer-tillage,deep apply fertilizer and straw returned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the farmers' mode,it could increase yield 2 926 kg·hm-2,the difference was significant,and could reduce cost and increase benefit 0.27 billion yuan per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–593 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.