Paper · 2013

Control Effect of Crushing Wheat Residue on Proxenus lepigone

Xiuqin Li

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment site was selected in P.lepigone seriously-occurance area.Wheat residue crushing machines were used to crush wheat residue one and two times instantly after wheat harvesting.The objectives of this study were to investigating the control effect of crushing wheat residue on P.lepigone,compared with straw directly return to fields(CK).The results showed that crushing wheat residue could disturb spawning environment of P.lepigone and also declined the number of larvas in the fileds,the control effect could reach 85% or higher.Residue crushing was an easy,labor-saving,time-saving and effective agricultural measurement,crushing one time could reach a good control effect(87.85%) and crushing two times could reach higher(90.38%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushing wheat residue declined the number of larvae of P.lepigone in the fields compared with straw returned directly.

Treatment
crushing wheat residuee2
Interactor
P.lepigonee2pest
Outcome
number of larvase2
Direction
declinede2
Comparator
straw directly return to fieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control Effect of Crushing Wheat Residue on Proxenus lepigone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“crushing wheat residue could disturb spawning environment of P.lepigone and also declined the number of larvas in the fileds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–496 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared with straw directly return to fields(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushing wheat residue once gave a good control effect of 87.85% against Proxenus lepigone.

Treatment
crushing one timee4
Interactor
Proxenus lepigonet0pest
Outcome
control effecte4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
87.85%e4
Comparator
straw directly return to fieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control Effect of Crushing Wheat Residue on Proxenus lepigone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared with straw directly return to fields(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–347 · show in text ↑
e4

“crushing one time could reach a good control effect(87.85%) and crushing two times could reach higher(90.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushing wheat residue twice gave a higher control effect of 90.38% against Proxenus lepigone.

Treatment
crushing two timese4
Interactor
Proxenus lepigonet0pest
Outcome
control effecte4
Direction
highere4
Value
90.38%e4
Comparator
straw directly return to fieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control Effect of Crushing Wheat Residue on Proxenus lepigone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared with straw directly return to fields(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–347 · show in text ↑
e4

“crushing one time could reach a good control effect(87.85%) and crushing two times could reach higher(90.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–744 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushing wheat residue could disturb the spawning environment of P.lepigone.

Treatment
crushing wheat residuee2
Interactor
P.lepigonee2pest
Outcome
spawning environmente2
Qualifier
coulde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control Effect of Crushing Wheat Residue on Proxenus lepigone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“crushing wheat residue could disturb spawning environment of P.lepigone and also declined the number of larvas in the fileds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–496 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Residue crushing is an easy, labour-saving, time-saving and effective agricultural measure against Proxenus lepigone.

Treatment
Residue crushinge5
Outcome
effective agricultural measuremente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control Effect of Crushing Wheat Residue on Proxenus lepigone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e5

“Residue crushing was an easy,labor-saving,time-saving and effective agricultural measurement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–634 · show in text ↑