Paper · 2015 · Kunchong zhishi

Dynamics and impact factor analysis of fly species diversity in Phyllostachys violascens stands

Xiao Cheng

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objectives] Phyllostachys violascens is an important bamboo species that can produce abundant edible bamboo shoots. However, some fly species parasitize bamboo shoots, leading to degraded shoot quality and yield decrease. The objectives of this study were to study the population dynamics and species diversity of flies in P. violascens stands. It can provide necessary biological knowledge for scientifically controlling these flies. Thus, this study is valuable for improving the shoot quality and output of artificially cultivated P. violascens. [Methods] The diversity of flies in P. violascens stands was investigated using yellow sticky traps. The effects of environmental factors on the Shannon-Wiener index of the fly community were analyzed using the multiple linear regression. In addition, the method of variation partitioning was employed to analyze the β diversity caused by environmental and spatial variables. [Results] Ten species of flies from 8 families were identified in P. violascens stands in the Dajingshan forest farm, among which Chyliza bambusae, Pegomyia kiangsuensis, Anthomyia illocata, Hydrotaea dentipes and Episyrphus balteata were the dominant species. The number of adult bamboos and that of young bamboo shoots within a radius of 1.5 m around yellow sticky traps had a significant influence on the species diversity of flies; diversity declined with increasing number of adult bamboos. Total variation of the species matrix can be partitioned as follows: spatial species variation not shared by the environmental variables comprised, 8.54%, non-spatial environmental variation, 28.84%, spatially structured environmental variation, 10.46%, and unexplained variation and stochastic fluctuations, 52.16%. [Conclusion] This study revealed the temporal dynamics of flies in P. violascens stands and illustrated the main factors affecting the species diversity of flies. These results have both practical and theoretical implications for increasing the production of bamboo shoots and also for the integrated management of the insect pests of bamboo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten fly species from eight families were identified in bamboo stands at Dajingshan forest farm.

Taxon
fliesDipterae0
Interactor
P. violascensPhyllostachys violascense0host
Outcome
Ten species of flies from 8 familiese0
Setting
Dajingshan forest farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phyllostachys violascens
Phyllostachys violascens · InteractorThesurvived99 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten species of flies from 8 families were identified in P. violascens stands in the Dajingshan forest farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chyliza bambusae was a dominant fly species.

Taxon
Chyliza bambusaeChyliza bambusaee0
Outcome
dominant speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Chyliza bambusae, Pegomyia kiangsuensis, Anthomyia illocata, Hydrotaea dentipes and Episyrphus balteata were the dominant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pegomyia kiangsuensis was a dominant fly species.

Taxon
Pegomyia kiangsuensise0
Outcome
dominant speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Chyliza bambusae, Pegomyia kiangsuensis, Anthomyia illocata, Hydrotaea dentipes and Episyrphus balteata were the dominant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthomyia illocata was a dominant fly species.

Taxon
Anthomyia illocataAnthomyia illocatae0
Outcome
dominant speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anthomyia illocata
Anthomyia illocata · TaxonAndrew C · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chyliza bambusae, Pegomyia kiangsuensis, Anthomyia illocata, Hydrotaea dentipes and Episyrphus balteata were the dominant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrotaea dentipes was a dominant fly species.

Taxon
Hydrotaea dentipesHydrotaea dentipese0
Outcome
dominant speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrotaea dentipes
Hydrotaea dentipes · TaxonJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chyliza bambusae, Pegomyia kiangsuensis, Anthomyia illocata, Hydrotaea dentipes and Episyrphus balteata were the dominant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Episyrphus balteata was a dominant fly species.

Taxon
Episyrphus balteatae0
Outcome
dominant speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Chyliza bambusae, Pegomyia kiangsuensis, Anthomyia illocata, Hydrotaea dentipes and Episyrphus balteata were the dominant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fly diversity declined significantly with increasing adult bamboo number near traps.

Taxon
fliesDipterae0
Interactor
bamboosBambusae0host
Outcome
species diversity of fliese0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
within a radius of 1.5 m around yellow sticky trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa
Bambusa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Stan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of adult bamboos and that of young bamboo shoots within a radius of 1.5 m around yellow sticky traps had a significant influence on the species diversity of flies; diversity declined with increasing number of adult bamboos.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1421 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Young bamboo shoot number significantly influenced fly diversity.

Taxon
fliesDipterae0
Organ / stage
young bamboo shootse0
Interactor
bambooBambuseaee0host
Outcome
species diversity of fliese0
Qualifier
within a radius of 1.5 m around yellow sticky trapse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The number of adult bamboos and that of young bamboo shoots within a radius of 1.5 m around yellow sticky traps had a significant influence on the species diversity of flies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshared spatial variation accounted for 8.54% of the species matrix variation.

Taxon
fliesDipterae1
Outcome
spatial species variation not shared by the environmental variablese0
Value
8.54%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“spatial species variation not shared by the environmental variables comprised, 8.54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1575 · show in text ↑
e1

“species diversity of flies; diversity declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-spatial environmental variation accounted for 28.84%.

Taxon
fliesDipterae1
Outcome
non-spatial environmental variatione0
Value
28.84%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“non-spatial environmental variation, 28.84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1620 · show in text ↑
e1

“species diversity of flies; diversity declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatially structured environmental variation accounted for 10.46%.

Taxon
fliesDipterae1
Outcome
spatially structured environmental variatione0
Value
10.46%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“spatially structured environmental variation, 10.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1674 · show in text ↑
e1

“species diversity of flies; diversity declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unexplained variation and stochastic fluctuations accounted for 52.16%.

Taxon
fliesDipterae1
Outcome
unexplained variation and stochastic fluctuationse0
Value
52.16%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“unexplained variation and stochastic fluctuations, 52.16%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1737 · show in text ↑
e1

“species diversity of flies; diversity declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1380 · show in text ↑