Paper · 2016 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Quantitative Behaviour of Guar (Cymopsis tetragnolobus L.) to Various Tillage Systems and Mulches and Soil Physical Properties

M. ShahidIbni Zamir; Muhammad Aamir Khan; Mazhar Hussain; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of organic mulches and tillage practices on growth, yield of cluster bean and soil physical properties. Experiment was comprised of two factors: A (Tillage), B (Mulches). Factor A was assigned to main plot and consisted of two treatments (Minimum tillage and Conventional tillage). Factor B was assigned to sub plot and consisted of four treatments (no mulch, wheat straw mulch, grass clipping mulch and saw dust mulch). The mulching materials were partially incorporated in the field after germination of crop. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with split plot arrangement having three replications. Control treatment was kept for comparison. All other agronomic practices were kept standardized and consistent for all the treatments. Data regarding growth and yield components were collected and analyzed statistically by fisher analysis of variance and treatment significance was measured by significant difference test at 5% probability level. The factors, tillage and mulches significantly affected growth, yield, yield parameters and soil physical properties. Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage. Mulches also affected grain yield, and maximum grain yield was recorded in wheat straw mulch (1.88 t•ha-1) followed by grass clipping mulch (1.81 t•ha-1) and saw dust mulch (1.76 t•ha-1) while minimum grain yield was recorded in control without mulch application (1.67 t•ha-1). Tillage and mulches interactively affect pH, soil organic matter contents, electrical conductivity and soil bulk density. Mulches and minimum tillage improved soil physical properties. Highest BCR was obtained from conventional tillage without mulch and lowest calculated from minimum tillage with saw dust application. The conclusion is that the mulching and conventional tillage improves cluster bean yield about 1%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant population was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 31.7 m2.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
31.7 m2e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant height was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 159 cm.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
159 cme0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

branches per plant was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 18.9.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
branches per plante0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
18.9e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cluster per plant was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 15.88.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
cluster per plante0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
15.88e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

grains per pod was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 7.3.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grains per pode0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
7.3e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1000-grain weight was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 34.6 g.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
34.6 ge0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

grain yield was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 1.9 t•ha-1.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.9 t•ha-1e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

biological yield was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 9.91 t•ha-1.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
9.91 t•ha-1e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

harvest index was highest under conventional tillage compared with minimum tillage in cluster bean, 19.15.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
19.15e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum plant population (31.7 m2), plant height (159 cm), branches per plant (18.9), cluster per plant (15.88), grains per pod (7.3), 1000-grain weight (34.6 g), grain yield (1.9 t•ha-1), biological yield (9.91 t•ha-1) and harvest index (19.15) was recorded in conventional tillage comparative to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch gave the highest grain yield in cluster bean, 1.88 t•ha-1, compared with control without mulch application.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
wheat straw mulche1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
1.88 t•ha-1e1
Comparator
control without mulch applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum grain yield was recorded in wheat straw mulch (1.88 t•ha-1) followed by grass clipping mulch (1.81 t•ha-1) and saw dust mulch (1.76 t•ha-1) while minimum grain yield was recorded in control without mulch application (1.67 t•ha-1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1508–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass clipping mulch gave a higher grain yield in cluster bean, 1.81 t•ha-1, than control without mulch application.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
grass clipping mulche1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.81 t•ha-1e1
Comparator
control without mulch applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum grain yield was recorded in wheat straw mulch (1.88 t•ha-1) followed by grass clipping mulch (1.81 t•ha-1) and saw dust mulch (1.76 t•ha-1) while minimum grain yield was recorded in control without mulch application (1.67 t•ha-1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1508–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saw dust mulch gave a higher grain yield in cluster bean, 1.76 t•ha-1, than control without mulch application.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
saw dust mulche1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1.76 t•ha-1e1
Comparator
control without mulch applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum grain yield was recorded in wheat straw mulch (1.88 t•ha-1) followed by grass clipping mulch (1.81 t•ha-1) and saw dust mulch (1.76 t•ha-1) while minimum grain yield was recorded in control without mulch application (1.67 t•ha-1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1508–1745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control without mulch application gave the minimum grain yield in cluster bean, 1.67 t•ha-1.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
control without mulch applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
minimume1
Value
1.67 t•ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“while minimum grain yield was recorded in control without mulch application (1.67 t•ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and mulches significantly affected growth, yield, yield parameters and soil physical properties of cluster bean.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
tillage and mulchese7
Outcome
growth, yield, yield parameters and soil physical propertiese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“The factors, tillage and mulches significantly affected growth, yield, yield parameters and soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and mulches interactively affect soil pH, soil organic matter contents and electrical conductivity in the cluster bean field.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
Tillage and mulchese2
Outcome
pH, soil organic matter contents, electrical conductivitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tillage and mulches interactively affect pH, soil organic matter contents, electrical conductivity and soil bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and mulches interactively affect soil bulk density in the cluster bean field.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
Tillage and mulchese2
Outcome
soil bulk densitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tillage and mulches interactively affect pH, soil organic matter contents, electrical conductivity and soil bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulches and minimum tillage improved soil physical properties in the cluster bean field.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
Mulches and minimum tillagee3
Outcome
soil physical propertiese3
Direction
improvede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mulches and minimum tillage improved soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was obtained from conventional tillage without mulch in cluster bean.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
conventional tillage without mulche4
Outcome
BCRe4
Direction
Higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest BCR was obtained from conventional tillage without mulch and lowest calculated from minimum tillage with saw dust application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was calculated from minimum tillage with saw dust application in cluster bean.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
minimum tillage with saw dust applicatione4
Outcome
BCRe4
Direction
loweste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest BCR was obtained from conventional tillage without mulch and lowest calculated from minimum tillage with saw dust application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching and conventional tillage improve cluster bean yield by about 1%.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae6
Treatment
mulching and conventional tillagee5
Outcome
cluster bean yielde5
Direction
improvese5
Value
about 1%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“The conclusion is that the mulching and conventional tillage improves cluster bean yield about 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2164 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · growth · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.