Abstract
There different grafting methods on growth and quality of cucumber in solar greenhouse were studied in this experiment.The results showed that the rate of growth of the cucumber by double root grafting method was optimal in the early stage,while the rate of growth of the cucumber by double root and double after grafting methods was better than the near grafting method in the rapid growth stage.For the quality of cucumber,double after grafting method was significantly better than the double root grafting method.Integrated the rate of growth and the quality of cucumber,it concludes that double after grafting method can result in high yield and quality of cucumber.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The double root grafting method gave the optimal growth rate in the early stage of cucumber.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0 - Organ / stage
- early stagee1
- Treatment
- double root grafting methode1
- Outcome
- rate of growthe1
- Direction
- optimale1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There different grafting methods on growth and quality of cucumber in solar greenhouse were studied in this experiment”
e1“the rate of growth of the cucumber by double root grafting method was optimal in the early stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The double root and double after grafting methods gave a better growth rate than near grafting in the rapid growth stage.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Organ / stage
- rapid growth stagee2
- Treatment
- double root and double after grafting methodse2
- Outcome
- rate of growthe2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Comparator
- near grafting methode2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There different grafting methods on growth and quality of cucumber in solar greenhouse were studied in this experiment”
e2“the rate of growth of the cucumber by double root and double after grafting methods was better than the near grafting method in the rapid growth stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The double after grafting method gave significantly better cucumber quality than the double root grafting method.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- double after grafting methode3
- Outcome
- quality of cucumbere3
- Direction
- significantly bettere3
- Comparator
- double root grafting methode3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There different grafting methods on growth and quality of cucumber in solar greenhouse were studied in this experiment”
e3“For the quality of cucumber, double after grafting method was significantly better than the double root grafting method”
Claim · model-written summary
The double after grafting method can give high yield and quality of cucumber.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- double after grafting methode4
- Outcome
- high yield and qualitye4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There different grafting methods on growth and quality of cucumber in solar greenhouse were studied in this experiment”
e4“it concludes that double after grafting method can result in high yield and quality of cucumber”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.