Paper · 2011 · Forest Research Open Access

Above-ground Biomass Allocation and Relationship with Ramet Component of Oligostachyum lubricum

Ying‐Chun Li

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The above-ground biomass and component factors of Oligostachyum lubricum were investigated and the above-ground biomass allocation and its relationship with ramet component were analyzed.The results indicated that present above-ground biomass allocation pattern of 1-year-old stands was stem﹥foliage﹥twig and that of 2-year-old stands was foliage﹥stem﹥twig.The rate of stem biomass of 2-year-old stands was extremely lower while that of foliage biomass of 2-year-old stands was extremely higher respectively than that of 1-year-old stands.However,there was no significant difference in twig biomass between 1-and 2-year-old stands.There were significant or very significant correlation between component factors and component biomass of 2-year-old stands.The total height(TH),height under branch(HB) and round of branches(RB) were subordinate factors of the diameter at breast-height(DBH) of 2-year-old stands.DBH of stands had decisive effects on the biomass of each component and above-ground part of stands and the relationship between them followed very significantly a cubic function.Increasing in allocation proportion of foliage biomass was beneficial to develop new habitat and consolidate present habitat for O.lubricum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one-year stands, above-ground biomass ranked stem, foliage, twig.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
1-year-old standse1
Outcome
stem﹥foliage﹥twige1

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“above-ground biomass allocation pattern of 1-year-old stands was stem﹥foliage﹥twig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–304 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two-year stands, above-ground biomass ranked foliage, stem, twig.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
2-year-old standse1
Outcome
foliage﹥stem﹥twige1

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“that of 2-year-old stands was foliage﹥stem﹥twig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–356 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem biomass rate was much lower in two-year than one-year stands.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
2-year-old standse1
Outcome
rate of stem biomasse1
Direction
extremely lowere1
Comparator
1-year-old standse1

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rate of stem biomass of 2-year-old stands was extremely lower while that of foliage biomass of 2-year-old stands was extremely higher respectively than that of 1-year-old stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–538 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage biomass rate was much higher in two-year than one-year stands.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
2-year-old standse1
Outcome
foliage biomasse1
Direction
extremely highere1
Comparator
1-year-old standse1

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rate of stem biomass of 2-year-old stands was extremely lower while that of foliage biomass of 2-year-old stands was extremely higher respectively than that of 1-year-old stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–538 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twig biomass did not significantly differ between one- and two-year stands.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
1-and 2-year-old standse1
Outcome
twig biomasse1
Direction
no significant differencee1

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was no significant difference in twig biomass between 1-and 2-year-old stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–630 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Component factors correlated significantly or very significantly with component biomass in two-year stands.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
2-year-old standse1
Outcome
component biomasse1
Qualifier
component factorse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were significant or very significant correlation between component factors and component biomass of 2-year-old stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–754 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total height, height under branch and branch rounds were subordinate to diameter at breast height in two-year stands.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
2-year-old standse1
Outcome
total height(TH),height under branch(HB) and round of branches(RB)e1
Qualifier
diameter at breast-height(DBH)e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total height(TH),height under branch(HB) and round of branches(RB) were subordinate factors of the diameter at breast-height(DBH) of 2-year-old stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–909 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter at breast height had decisive effects on component and total above-ground biomass, with a significant cubic relationship.

Taxon
Oligostachyum lubricumOligostachyum lubricume0
Organ / stage
standse1
Outcome
biomass of each component and above-ground part of standse1
Qualifier
DBH of standse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Oligostachyum lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“DBH of stands had decisive effects on the biomass of each component and above-ground part of stands and the relationship between them followed very significantly a cubic function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1088 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing foliage biomass allocation was interpreted as beneficial to developing and consolidating habitat.

Outcome
develop new habitat and consolidate present habitate0
Qualifier
Increasing in allocation proportion of foliage biomasse0

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing in allocation proportion of foliage biomass was beneficial to develop new habitat and consolidate present habitat for O.lubricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1228 · show in text ↑