Abstract
Since the majority of wheat varieties were insensitive to gibberellin,so when relative high MS lines and gibberellin-insensitive restorers were used in hybrid seed production,the way that increasing the plant height difference beyond restorer gibberellin spraying must be taken,and to lower the height of MS will be a desirable option.In order to explore appropriate doses of uniconazole and uniconazole sensitivity of different MS lines in powder seed dressing,the different doses of uniconazole was used in this study.The results obtained were Uniconazole powder seed dressing could significantly reduce the plant height of wheat male sterile lines;and 30 mg/kg was the optimum dose for the majority MS lines tested,there was difference between MS lines in sensitivity to uniconazole,while no significant difference in height reducing rate in the uniconazole dosage of 20 mg·kg-1,the height reducing rate of 268S was the highest among 4 MS lines,significantly higher than that of Haida S-1 and Haida S-2,and there was no significant difference between 268S and 2110-2-5-2-5S.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Uniconazole powder seed dressing significantly reduced male-sterile wheat height.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- male sterile linese0
- Treatment
- Uniconazole powder seed dressinge0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Uniconazole powder seed dressing could significantly reduce the plant height of wheat male sterile lines”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimum dose for most tested lines was 30 mg/kg.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- MS linese0
- Outcome
- optimum dosee0
- Value
- 30 mg/kge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“30 mg/kg was the optimum dose for the majority MS lines tested”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Male-sterile lines differed in uniconazole sensitivity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- MS linese0
- Outcome
- sensitivity to uniconazolee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was difference between MS lines in sensitivity to uniconazole”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
At 20 mg·kg-1, height reduction rates did not differ significantly.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- uniconazole dosage of 20 mg·kg-1e0
- Outcome
- height reducing ratee0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant difference in height reducing rate in the uniconazole dosage of 20 mg·kg-1”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
268S had the highest height reduction rate among four lines, significantly exceeding Haida S-1 and Haida S-2.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- 268Se0
- Outcome
- height reducing ratee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- Haida S-1 and Haida S-2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the height reducing rate of 268S was the highest among 4 MS lines,significantly higher than that of Haida S-1 and Haida S-2”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
268S and 2110-2-5-2-5S did not differ significantly in height reduction rate.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- 268Se0
- Outcome
- no significant differencee0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- 2110-2-5-2-5Se0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significant difference between 268S and 2110-2-5-2-5S”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
uniconazole · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
431 papers more in this group
See all 435 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.