Paper · 1999 · CHINESE BULLETIN OF BOTANY

THE EFFECT OF SPROUT PROMOTION OF VIRUS FREE PRE BASIC SEED POTATO IN MOIST SAND BEFORE SOWING UPON GROWTH AND YIELD

Peng Lü

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper is to compare two different promoting techniques of sprout_promotion of virus free pre basic seed potato. The result revealed that moist sand treatment is much better than normal diffused light treatment with respect to growth vigor and plant yield. The moist sand treatment had increased stem numbers, growth rate of stem (growth yield per unit time) and plant height. The growth rate of main stems are same,but the leaf age of the main stems are one leaf faster than normal treatment. It also increased the number of tubers and improved the evenness of the shape of tubers. In view of virus free seed potato production sequence (virus free pre basic potato seed→primary virus_free seed potato→commercial seed potato) moist sand treatment has a good effect on shape eveness and yield of primary virus_free seed potato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moist sand sprout promotion outperformed diffuse light for growth vigor and plant yield.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
moist sand treatmente0
Outcome
growth vigor and plant yielde0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
normal diffused light treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moist sand treatment is much better than normal diffused light treatment with respect to growth vigor and plant yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moist sand increased stem number, stem growth rate, and plant height.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
moist sand treatmente0
Outcome
stem numbers, growth rate of stem (growth yield per unit time) and plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal diffused light treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“The moist sand treatment had increased stem numbers, growth rate of stem (growth yield per unit time) and plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–380 · show in text ↑
e1

“normal diffused light treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main stem growth rate was the same under moist sand and normal treatments.

Taxon
seed potatot0
Treatment
moist sand treatmente1
Outcome
growth rate of main stemse0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
normal treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The growth rate of main stems are same,but the leaf age of the main stems are one leaf faster than normal treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–497 · show in text ↑
e1

“moist sand treatment is much better than normal diffused light treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–214 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main stem leaf age was one leaf ahead under moist sand treatment.

Taxon
seed potatot0
Treatment
moist sand treatmente1
Outcome
leaf age of the main stemse0
Direction
fastere0
Value
one leafe0
Comparator
normal treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf age of the main stems are one leaf faster than normal treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–497 · show in text ↑
e1

“moist sand treatment is much better than normal diffused light treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–214 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moist sand increased tuber number and improved tuber shape evenness.

Taxon
seed potatot0
Treatment
moist sand treatmente1
Outcome
number of tubers and improved the evenness of the shape of tuberse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal treatmente2

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased the number of tubers and improved the evenness of the shape of tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“moist sand treatment is much better than normal diffused light treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude moist sand improves shape evenness and yield of primary virus-free seed potato.

Taxon
primary virus_free seed potatoe0
Outcome
shape eveness and yielde0
Direction
good effecte0

Verbatim

e0

“moist sand treatment has a good effect on shape eveness and yield of primary virus_free seed potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–830 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.