Paper · 2002 · Zhongguo shuidao kexue

Weed Control Technique for Upland Rice after Seedling Emergence

Dong Li

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Different combinations of herbicide 20% propanil and 56% mcpa Na were used to upland rice for post emergence treatment in 1996-1998. Results showed that 20% propanil 7.5-11.5 kg/hm 2 combining with 56% mcpa Na 0.25-0.75 kg/hm 2 and sprayed with water 750-900 kg/hm 2 on stems and leaves at 2-6 leaves seedling stage could get satisfying effects, the rice plant grew strongly and had resistance to lodging. Within safety and valid range, the combinations had no adverse effect on plant height, tiller number, panicle length, and grains number per panicle.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified propanil and mcpa Na combination achieved satisfactory effects

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
20% propanil 7.5-11.5 kg/hm 2 combining with 56% mcpa Na 0.25-0.75 kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
20% propanil 7.5-11.5 kg/hm 2 combining with 56% mcpa Na 0.25-0.75 kg/hm 2 and sprayed with water 750-900 kg/hm 2 on stems and leaves at 2-6 leaves seedling stage could get satisfying effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20% propanil 7.5-11.5 kg/hm 2 combining with 56% mcpa Na 0.25-0.75 kg/hm 2 and sprayed with water 750-900 kg/hm 2 on stems and leaves at 2-6 leaves seedling stage could get satisfying effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated rice grew strongly and resisted lodging

Outcome
the rice plant grew strongly and had resistance to lodginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice plant grew strongly and had resistance to lodging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations had no adverse effect on height, tillers, panicle length and grains per panicle

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
the combinationse0
Outcome
the combinations had no adverse effect on plant height, tiller number, panicle length, and grains number per paniclee0
Direction
no adverse effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combinations had no adverse effect on plant height, tiller number, panicle length, and grains number per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 · show in text ↑

propanil · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.