Paper · 2012 · Modern Agrochemicals

Comparison of Field Efficiency with Ten Fungicides Controlling Rice Sheath Blight

MA Ya-fang

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to screen excellent,low-toxic and safe fungicides for controlling rice sheath blight(Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn),the field trials of ten fungicides controlling rice sheath blight were carried out according to GB/T 17980.20-2000 and adding the efficiency of sickness plant(SPE).The results showed that the field efficiency of azoxystrobin 250 g/L SC was 87.53%.The field efficiencies of five fungicides,such as coumoxystrobin 20% SC,propiconazole 25% EC,difenoconazole 10% WG,tebuconazole 80% WP and triadimenol 15% WP,were 71.97%-79.59%.The field efficiencies of three fungicides,such as thiophanate-methyl 70% WP,validamycin 10% AS and thifluzamide 240 g/L SC,were 63.92%-66.78%.The last one was prochloraz 15% ME and its field efficiency was 46.73%.The trend of SPE and field efficiency was consistent.All ten fungicides were safe to rice plant.So azoxystrobin,coumoxystrobin,propiconazole,difenoconazole,tebuconazole and triadimenol were recommended to control rice sheath blight.Coumoxystrobin had been priority.In order to retard resistance,mixture or rotation was beneficial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin 250 g/L SC had field efficiency of 87.53%.

Treatment
azoxystrobin 250 g/L SCe0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
87.53%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the field efficiency of azoxystrobin 250 g/L SC was 87.53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named fungicides had field efficiencies of 71.97%-79.59%.

Outcome
field efficienciese0
Value
71.97%-79.59%e0
Qualifier
coumoxystrobin 20% SC,propiconazole 25% EC,difenoconazole 10% WG,tebuconazole 80% WP and triadimenol 15% WPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field efficiencies of five fungicides,such as coumoxystrobin 20% SC,propiconazole 25% EC,difenoconazole 10% WG,tebuconazole 80% WP and triadimenol 15% WP,were 71.97%-79.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three named fungicides had field efficiencies of 63.92%-66.78%.

Outcome
field efficienciese0
Value
63.92%-66.78%e0
Qualifier
thiophanate-methyl 70% WP,validamycin 10% AS and thifluzamide 240 g/L SCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field efficiencies of three fungicides,such as thiophanate-methyl 70% WP,validamycin 10% AS and thifluzamide 240 g/L SC,were 63.92%-66.78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz 15% ME had field efficiency of 46.73%.

Treatment
prochloraz 15% MEe0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
46.73%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The last one was prochloraz 15% ME and its field efficiency was 46.73%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE and field efficiency followed consistent trends.

Outcome
trend of SPE and field efficiencye0
Comparator
field efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trend of SPE and field efficiency was consistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All ten fungicides were safe for rice plants.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativae0
Outcome
safe to rice plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All ten fungicides were safe to rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–852 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended six named fungicides for controlling rice sheath blight.

Outcome
control rice sheath blighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“azoxystrobin,coumoxystrobin,propiconazole,difenoconazole,tebuconazole and triadimenol were recommended to control rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors gave priority to coumoxystrobin.

Outcome
Coumoxystrobin had been prioritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coumoxystrobin had been priority”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended mixture or rotation to retard resistance.

Outcome
mixture or rotation was beneficiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to retard resistance,mixture or rotation was beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Sheath Blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑