Paper · 2011 · He'nan nongye kexue

Effects of Aerobic Fermentation Seedling-breeding in Higher Temperature on Agronomic Characters and Economic Traits of Flue-cured Tobacco

Deng Shiyuan

9
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to resolve the influence of low temperature during seedling-breeding on the growth of tobacco in southern tobacco planting region,aerobic fermentation materials were paved on the bottom of nutrition pool,then the water temperature,growth status of tobacco and agronomic characters,accumulation of dry matter after transplanting and economic traits such as yield and output value were determined.Results showed that laying aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed could increase the temperature of nutrition pool,shorten seedling growing period by 13 days,and the ratio of strong seedling reached 95%.After transplanting,the stem length,stem girth and root length were greater but the pitch was less than the control,so there were more leaves.There existed significant difference on accumulation of dry matter include overground and underground between treatment of peanut bran and the control.The yield,output value,ratios of grade A and grade B leaves were better than the control obviously.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation materials, especially peanut bran, increased nutrition-pool temperature.

Treatment
aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut brane0
Outcome
temperature of nutrition poole0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“laying aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed could increase the temperature of nutrition pool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation materials shortened the seedling growing period by 13 days.

Treatment
aerobic fermentation materialse1
Outcome
seedling growing periode0
Direction
shortene0
Value
13 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shorten seedling growing period by 13 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With fermentation materials, the strong-seedling ratio reached 95%.

Outcome
ratio of strong seedlinge0
Value
95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratio of strong seedling reached 95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After transplanting, treated tobacco had greater stem length, stem girth and root length than control.

Treatment
peanut brane1
Outcome
stem length,stem girth and root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After transplanting,the stem length,stem girth and root length were greater but the pitch was less than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After transplanting, treated tobacco had less pitch than control.

Treatment
peanut brane1
Outcome
pitche0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pitch was less than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated tobacco had more leaves.

Treatment
peanut brane1
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“so there were more leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut-bran treatment significantly changed aboveground and belowground dry-matter accumulation from control.

Treatment
peanut brane0
Outcome
accumulation of dry matter include overground and undergrounde0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There existed significant difference on accumulation of dry matter include overground and underground between treatment of peanut bran and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation treatment improved yield and output value relative to control.

Treatment
peanut brane1
Outcome
yield,output valuee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield,output value,ratios of grade A and grade B leaves were better than the control obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation treatment improved grade A and B leaf ratios relative to control.

Treatment
peanut brane1
Outcome
ratios of grade A and grade B leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield,output value,ratios of grade A and grade B leaves were better than the control obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“aerobic fermentation materials especially peanut bran under the seedling-bed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.