Paper · 2004 · Hubei nongye kexue

Different planting densities experiment on new rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9

Yang Jing-ze

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiment on different planting densities for rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9 was carried out. It was showed that Zhongshuang No. 9 yielded 2382.3 kg/hm2 on average under planting density of 1.65×105plants/hm2?熏 4.65%?熏 8.87%?熏 9.37% and 21.07% higher than that of 2.1×105 plants/hm2?熏 1.2×105 plants/hm2?熏 2.7×105 plants/hm2 and 7.5×104 plants/hm2?熏 respectively. The largest effect of planting density was found in total pods per unit area?熏 then on 1000-seed weight and seeds per pod. The plant agronomic traits were affected by the different planting densities. With density increasing?熏 plant height dropped?熏 the first primary branch went height?熏 the primary branches decreased?熏 pods in primary branches decreased and the ratio of pods in main inflorescence to total pods increased significantly. It was indicated thereby that the rational density benefits the increase of total pods per unit area in order to obtain high yield per unit area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.65×105 plants/hm2, yield averaged 2382.3 kg/hm2.

Material
Zhongshuang No. 9e0
Treatment
planting density of 1.65×105plants/hm2e0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
2382.3 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zhongshuang No. 9 yielded 2382.3 kg/hm2 on average under planting density of 1.65×105plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–210 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That density yielded 4.65% more than 2.1×105 plants/hm2.

Outcome
highere0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.65%e0
Comparator
2.1×105 plants/hm2e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.65%?熏 8.87%?熏 9.37% and 21.07% higher than that of 2.1×105 plants/hm2?熏 1.2×105 plants/hm2?熏 2.7×105 plants/hm2 and 7.5×104 plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That density yielded 8.87% more than 1.2×105 plants/hm2.

Outcome
highere0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.87%e0
Comparator
1.2×105 plants/hm2e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.65%?熏 8.87%?熏 9.37% and 21.07% higher than that of 2.1×105 plants/hm2?熏 1.2×105 plants/hm2?熏 2.7×105 plants/hm2 and 7.5×104 plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That density yielded 9.37% more than 2.7×105 plants/hm2.

Outcome
highere0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.37%e0
Comparator
2.7×105 plants/hm2e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.65%?熏 8.87%?熏 9.37% and 21.07% higher than that of 2.1×105 plants/hm2?熏 1.2×105 plants/hm2?熏 2.7×105 plants/hm2 and 7.5×104 plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That density yielded 21.07% more than 7.5×104 plants/hm2.

Outcome
highere0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.07%e0
Comparator
7.5×104 plants/hm2e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.65%?熏 8.87%?熏 9.37% and 21.07% higher than that of 2.1×105 plants/hm2?熏 1.2×105 plants/hm2?熏 2.7×105 plants/hm2 and 7.5×104 plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density affected pods per area most, followed by seed weight and seeds per pod.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
largest effecte0
Direction
largeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest effect of planting density was found in total pods per unit area?熏 then on 1000-seed weight and seeds per pod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height dropped with increasing density.

Treatment
density increasinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
droppede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With density increasing?熏 plant height dropped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First primary branch height rose with density.

Outcome
first primary branche0
Direction
went heighte0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first primary branch went height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary branch number decreased with density.

Outcome
primary branchese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the primary branches decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods on primary branches decreased with density.

Outcome
pods in primary branchese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pods in primary branches decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of main inflorescence pods increased significantly with density.

Outcome
ratio of pods in main inflorescence to total podse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratio of pods in main inflorescence to total pods increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude rational density increases pods per area and yield.

Outcome
rational densitye0
Qualifier
high yield per unit areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rational density benefits the increase of total pods per unit area in order to obtain high yield per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape cultivar Zhongshuang No. 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78 · show in text ↑