Paper · 2007 · Xibu linye kexue

A Preliminary Study on Adaptability of Different Poplar Species in Minqin

LI Ya

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The adaptabilities of 31 poplar species in Minqin were studied by cutting in April 2006.The growth of cuttings of different poplar species was monitored.The results showed that the rooting time,cutting survival ratio,height and basal diameter of different species were considerably different.There is very significant positive correlation between height growth and basal diameter growth.The regressive equation is y=1.1572 x-0.1857(R2=0.8597).Through cluster analysis on survival ratio,height and basal diameter,it was revealed that the adaptabilities of P.deltoides × cathayana CL.'Zhongsui―4',P.×'Neimengensis―30',(P.×xiaozhuanica cv.'Chifengensis')× P.pyramidalis and P.× euramericana Guinier cv.'Sacrau―79'were very good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.3 m and 1.4 cm respectively.These four species can be the priority species for farmland shelter forest.The adaptability of P.davidiana×P.charbinensis C.Wang et Skv.cv.'Hebei-yixian―2',P.langfanggensis Wang No.4,Populus 'ZGY'were good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1 m and 1 cm respectively.The performance of P.deltoids cv.I―69/55 was special,the survival ratio was lower than 10 %,however the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.5 m and 1.5 cm respectively.This species can be utilized after the survival rate is increased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting time and cutting survival ratio differed considerably among poplar species.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
rooting time,cutting survival ratioe1
Qualifier
considerably differente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the rooting time,cutting survival ratio,height and basal diameter of different species were considerably different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height and basal diameter differed considerably among poplar species.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
height and basal diametere1
Qualifier
considerably differente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the rooting time,cutting survival ratio,height and basal diameter of different species were considerably different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Height growth and basal diameter growth were very significantly positively correlated.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
height growthe2
Direction
very significant positive correlatione2
Comparator
basal diameter growthe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“There is very significant positive correlation between height growth and basal diameter growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–386 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The regression equation for height and basal diameter growth had R2 = 0.8597.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
regressive equatione3
Value
R2=0.8597e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The regressive equation is y=1.1572 x-0.1857(R2=0.8597)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–442 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four poplar species had very good adaptability on cluster analysis of survival, height and basal diameter.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
very goode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“were very good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.3 m and 1.4 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four best poplar species had a survival ratio higher than 50%.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
survival ratioe4
Direction
higher thane4
Value
50 %e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“were very good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.3 m and 1.4 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four best poplar species had height bigger than 1.3 m.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
heighte4
Direction
bigger thane4
Value
1.3 me4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“were very good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.3 m and 1.4 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four best poplar species had basal diameter bigger than 1.4 cm.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
basal diametere4
Direction
bigger thane4
Value
1.4 cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“were very good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.3 m and 1.4 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–839 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

These four poplar species can be priority species for farmland shelter forest.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
priority species for farmland shelter foreste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“These four species can be the priority species for farmland shelter forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–914 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three further poplar species had good adaptability.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
goode6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“'ZGY'were good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1 m and 1 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three further poplar species had survival ratio higher than 50%.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
survival ratioe6
Direction
higher thane6
Value
50 %e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“'ZGY'were good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1 m and 1 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three further poplar species had height bigger than 1 m.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
heighte6
Direction
bigger thane6
Value
1 me6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“'ZGY'were good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1 m and 1 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three further poplar species had basal diameter bigger than 1 cm.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
basal diametere6
Direction
bigger thane6
Value
1 cme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“'ZGY'were good.The survival ratio is higher than 50 %,the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1 m and 1 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar P.deltoids cv. I-69/55 had a survival ratio lower than 10%.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
survival ratioe0
Direction
lower thane0
Value
10 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the survival ratio was lower than 10 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.deltoids cv. I-69/55 had height bigger than 1.5 m.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
heighte7
Direction
bigger thane7
Value
1.5 me7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.5 m and 1.5 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.deltoids cv. I-69/55 had basal diameter bigger than 1.5 cm.

Taxon
Poplar SpeciesPopulust0
Outcome
basal diametere7
Direction
bigger thane7
Value
1.5 cme7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Different Poplar Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“the height and basal diameter are bigger than 1.5 m and 1.5 cm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1332 · show in text ↑