Abstract
Progeny test on 39 open-pollinated families from 9 provenances of Cinnamomum glanduliferum was studied.The results showed that there were variations in ground diameter,height and canopy breadth for both provenances and families,while the variations in ground diameter among provenances were significant and those in ground diameter,height and canopy breadth were extremely significant.Results also indicated that the provenance heritability for ground diameter was 0.63,the family heritability for ground diameter,height and canopy breadth were 0.83,0.89 and 0.85 respectively,which showed that the three traits were strongly affected by family.One superior provenance with genetic gain of 6.38% in ground diameter was selected,and seven families were also selected as superior families with mean genetic gain of 19.07% in ground diameter,mean genetic gain of 14.9% in height and mean genetic gain of 13.35% in canopy breadth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Ground diameter varied significantly among provenances.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferum
Cinnamomum glanduliferumt0 - Material
- provenancese0
- Outcome
- ground diametere0
- Direction
- variationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“variations in ground diameter among provenances were significant”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Ground diameter, height, and canopy breadth varied extremely significantly among families.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Material
- familiese0
- Outcome
- ground diameter,height and canopy breadthe0
- Direction
- variationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were variations in ground diameter,height and canopy breadth for both provenances and families,while the variations in ground diameter among provenances were significant and those in ground diameter,height and canopy breadth were extremely significant”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Provenance heritability for ground diameter was 0.63.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Outcome
- provenance heritability for ground diametere0
- Value
- 0.63e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“provenance heritability for ground diameter was 0.63”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Family heritability of ground diameter was 0.83.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Outcome
- family heritability for ground diametere0
- Value
- 0.83e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“family heritability for ground diameter,height and canopy breadth were 0.83,0.89 and 0.85 respectively”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Family heritability of height was 0.89.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Outcome
- heighte0
- Value
- 0.89e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“family heritability for ground diameter,height and canopy breadth were 0.83,0.89 and 0.85 respectively”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Family heritability of canopy breadth was 0.85.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Outcome
- canopy breadthe0
- Value
- 0.85e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“family heritability for ground diameter,height and canopy breadth were 0.83,0.89 and 0.85 respectively”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
A superior provenance yielded 6.38% genetic gain in ground diameter.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Material
- superior provenancee0
- Outcome
- genetic gaine0
- Value
- 6.38%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“One superior provenance with genetic gain of 6.38% in ground diameter was selected”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Seven selected families averaged 19.07% genetic gain in ground diameter.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Material
- superior familiese0
- Outcome
- genetic gaine0
- Value
- 19.07%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seven families were also selected as superior families with mean genetic gain of 19.07% in ground diameter”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Selected families averaged 14.9% genetic gain in height.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Outcome
- genetic gaine0
- Value
- 14.9%e0
Not reportedOrgan / stage
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mean genetic gain of 14.9% in height”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”
Claim · model-written summary
Selected families averaged 13.35% genetic gain in canopy breadth.
- Taxon
- Cinnamomum glanduliferumCinnamomum glanduliferumt0
- Outcome
- genetic gaine0
- Value
- 13.35%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mean genetic gain of 13.35% in canopy breadth”
t0“Cinnamomum glanduliferum”