Paper · 2002 · Nongyaoxue xuebao

Effects of Different Viscosity Mechanical OilAdjuvants on Herbicides Activity

Jin Wang

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Several experiments were conducted in greenhouse to evaluate the effects of 10 mechanical oil concentrates on the efficacies of cyanazine and nicosulfuron for the control of barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv.) and velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti Medic.). Results showed that all the mechanical oil concentrates enhanced the activity differently with different viscosity. Of 10 adjuvants, the one with viscosity of 46 mm 2/s (40℃) (MOC 46 ) was most effective and that with 32 mm 2/s (40℃) followed. The enhancement to cyanazine is better than to nicosulfuron. The order of enhancement of MOC 46 on different herbicides was: atrazine and cyanazineatrazine+cyanazine and atrazine+ nicosulfuron cyanazine+ nicosulfuron nicosulfuron. All the treatments above, the order of safety to maize seedlings was: atrazine/nicosulfuron/atrazine+ nicosulfuron cyanazine+atrazine and cyanazine+nicosulfuroncyanazine. Cyanazine with the addition of MOC 46 had detrimental effects on maize seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical oil concentrates enhanced herbicidal activity, varying with viscosity.

Treatment
mechanical oil concentratese0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Herbicides Activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results showed that all the mechanical oil concentrates enhanced the activity differently with different viscosity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 46 mm 2/s adjuvant was most effective.

Treatment
MOC 46e0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
46 mm 2/se0
Comparator
10 adjuvantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Of 10 adjuvants, the one with viscosity of 46 mm 2/s (40℃) (MOC 46 ) was most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 32 mm 2/s adjuvant ranked second.

Treatment
32 mm 2/s (40℃)e0
Outcome
followede0
Direction
followede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and that with 32 mm 2/s (40℃) followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhancement was greater for cyanazine than nicosulfuron.

Treatment
cyanazinee0
Outcome
enhancemente0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement to cyanazine is better than to nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanazine plus MOC 46 harmed maize seedlings.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Cyanazine with the addition of MOC 46e0
Outcome
detrimental effects on maize seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyanazine with the addition of MOC 46 had detrimental effects on maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–998 · show in text ↑

cyanazine · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.