Paper · 2013 · Zhōnghuá yàoxué zázhì

Investigation of Genetic Diversity of Yam Cultivars by SRAP Markers

Zheng-Ming Tao

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the genetic diversity of yam resources in China and provide reliable molecular evidences for cultivar identification and genetic relationship.METHODS Sequence-related amplified polymorphism(SRAP) was applied to detect the genetic diversity of 21 yam cultivars from eight cultivated populations,Popgene software(version 1.32) was used to calculate genetic parameters,UPGMA clustering was carried out using Mega software(version 4.1),and principal component analysis was performed with the help of Ntsys-pc(Version 2.1) program.RESULTS Three hundreds and nine bands were amplified by 20 SRAP primer combinations,of which 289 bands were polymorphic.The Nei′s gene diversity index(H=0.288 1),Shannon′s information index(I=0.441 6) and total genetic diversity(Ht=0.289 1) revealed a relatively high genetic diversity level among yam populations.Within populations,HNWX population showed the highest genetic diversity(PPB= 35.92%),whereas the lowest diversity(PPB=0) was observed in FJSM and ZJRG populations.The genetic differentiation coefficient(Gst=0.865 8) and genetic flow(Nm=0.007 5) indicated that the genetic diversity among populations was higher than that of within populations.A well-separated groups coupling with cultivated species was formed according to the genetic distance(GD) ranging from 0.049 8-0.487 9 of the investigated populations.Twenty-one investigated cultivars could be distinguished and be effectively grouped into four origins,i.e.,Dioscorea opposita Thunb.,Dioscorea alata Linn.,Dioscorea persimilis Prain et Burkill.and Dioscorea fordii Prain et Burkill..CONCLUSION The genetic diversity level of yam resources is high,and relatively high genetic variation exists among four yam species.SRAP marker is an effective method to identify and classify numerous yam cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRAP primers produced 309 bands, 289 polymorphic.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
bandse0
Value
289 bandse0

Verbatim

e0

“Three hundreds and nine bands were amplified by 20 SRAP primer combinations,of which 289 bands were polymorphic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yam populations had relatively high genetic diversity, with Nei index 0.288 1.

Taxon
yame0
Outcome
Nei′s gene diversity indexe0
Value
0.288 1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Nei′s gene diversity index(H=0.288 1),Shannon′s information index(I=0.441 6) and total genetic diversity(Ht=0.289 1) revealed a relatively high genetic diversity level among yam populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shannon information index was 0.441 6.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
Shannon′s information indexe0
Value
0.441 6e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shannon′s information index(I=0.441 6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total genetic diversity was 0.289 1.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
total genetic diversitye0
Value
0.289 1e0

Verbatim

e0

“total genetic diversity(Ht=0.289 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNWX had the highest within-population diversity, 35.92%.

Taxon
yamt0
Material
HNWX populatione0
Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
35.92%e0

Verbatim

e0

“HNWX population showed the highest genetic diversity(PPB= 35.92%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FJSM and ZJRG had the lowest within-population diversity, zero.

Taxon
yamt0
Material
FJSM and ZJRG populationse0
Outcome
diversitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0e0

Verbatim

e0

“lowest diversity(PPB=0) was observed in FJSM and ZJRG populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic differentiation coefficient was 0.865 8.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
genetic differentiation coefficiente0
Value
0.865 8e0

Verbatim

e0

“genetic differentiation coefficient(Gst=0.865 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene flow was 0.007 5.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
genetic flowe0
Value
0.007 5e0

Verbatim

e0

“genetic flow(Nm=0.007 5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic diversity among populations exceeded diversity within populations.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
genetic diversity among populationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
within populationse0

Verbatim

e0

“genetic diversity among populations was higher than that of within populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic distances ranged from 0.049 8-0.487 9 and groups matched cultivated species.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
genetic distance(GD)e0
Value
0.049 8-0.487 9e0

Verbatim

e0

“A well-separated groups coupling with cultivated species was formed according to the genetic distance(GD) ranging from 0.049 8-0.487 9 of the investigated populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-one yam cultivars were distinguished into four species origins.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
investigated cultivars could be distinguished and be effectively grouped into four originse0
Value
Twenty-onee0

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty-one investigated cultivars could be distinguished and be effectively grouped into four origins,i.e.,Dioscorea opposita Thunb.,Dioscorea alata Linn.,Dioscorea persimilis Prain et Burkill.and Dioscorea fordii Prain et Burkill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–41 · show in text ↑