Abstract
0.3% neem extract pesticide was sprayed to control cabbage moth in sugarbeet field.The experimental results showed that the control effect was from 74.8%to 93.2%in comparison with the CK pesticide,and the root yield increased by 29.4%in comparison with the CK.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Neem extract pesticide achieved 74.8% to 93.2% cabbage moth control relative to CK pesticide.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 0.3% neem extract pesticidee0
- Interactor
- cabbage mothe0pest
- Outcome
- control effecte0
- Value
- 74.8%to 93.2%e0
- Comparator
- CK pesticidee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0.3% neem extract pesticide was sprayed to control cabbage moth in sugarbeet field.The experimental results showed that the control effect was from 74.8%to 93.2%in comparison with the CK pesticide”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem extract pesticide increased sugarbeet root yield by 29.4% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 29.4%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the root yield increased by 29.4%in comparison with the CK”
t0“Sugarbeet”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · control · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
insecticide · control · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.