Abstract
Six ear-kernel characters of two heterotic maize populations were analyzed under two planting densities.The results showed that ear-kernel characters were all complex quantitative traits in heredity.High planting density deteriorated all the characters,except ear diameter,and increased the variations of all characters,except 100-grain weight for the non-Reid population.High planting density was favorable for phenotypic selection of ear-kernel characters.Ear-kernel weight and ear length were the suitable selection criterion in planting density stress.Compared to non-Reid population,Reid population was less influenced by planting density.Ear-kernel weight was determined commonly by all ear-kernel characters.Great attention should be paid on coordinating the relations among different ear-kernel characters during the inbred line development from Reid population.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Ear-kernel characters of maize were all complex quantitative traits in heredity.
- Outcome
- complex quantitative traits in hereditye2
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e2“The results showed that ear-kernel characters were all complex quantitative traits in heredity”
Claim · model-written summary
High planting density deteriorated all the ear-kernel characters except ear diameter.
- Treatment
- High planting densitye3
- Outcome
- all the characterse3
- Direction
- deterioratede3
- Qualifier
- except ear diametere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e3“High planting density deteriorated all the characters,except ear diameter”
Claim · model-written summary
High planting density increased the variations of all characters except 100-grain weight in the non-Reid population.
- Material
- non-Reid populatione4
- Treatment
- High planting densitye3
- Outcome
- variations of all characterse4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Qualifier
- except 100-grain weighte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e3“High planting density deteriorated all the characters,except ear diameter”
e4“and increased the variations of all characters,except 100-grain weight for the non-Reid population”
Claim · model-written summary
High planting density was favorable for phenotypic selection of ear-kernel characters.
- Treatment
- High planting densitye5
- Outcome
- phenotypic selection of ear-kernel characterse5
- Qualifier
- favorablee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e5“High planting density was favorable for phenotypic selection of ear-kernel characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear-kernel weight and ear length were the suitable selection criteria under planting density stress.
- Outcome
- Ear-kernel weight and ear lengthe6
- Qualifier
- suitable selection criterion in planting density stresse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e6“Ear-kernel weight and ear length were the suitable selection criterion in planting density stress”
Claim · model-written summary
The Reid population was less influenced by planting density than the non-Reid population.
- Material
- Reid populatione7
- Outcome
- influenced by planting densitye7
- Direction
- lesse7
- Comparator
- non-Reid populatione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e7“Compared to non-Reid population,Reid population was less influenced by planting density”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear-kernel weight was determined commonly by all ear-kernel characters.
- Outcome
- Ear-kernel weight was determined commonly by all ear-kernel characterse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e1“Ear-kernel weight was determined commonly by all ear-kernel characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Attention should be paid to coordinating the relations among different ear-kernel characters during inbred line development from the Reid population.
- Outcome
- coordinating the relations among different ear-kernel characterse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Two Maize Heterotic Populations”
e1“Great attention should be paid on coordinating the relations among different ear-kernel characters during the inbred line development from Reid population”