Paper · 2014

Effects of Planting Density on Growth,Development and Yield Components of Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton

Haiyan Wang

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of different planting densities( 18000 ~ 54000 plant /hm2) on the growth,development,yield,and yield components of hybrid insect- resistant cotton variety Zhongmiansuo 75 were studied through filed tests. The results indicated that:when plant density increased,the whole growth and developmental duration of cotton shortened,plant height decreased firstly and then slightly increased,dry matter weight per plant,total fruit- branch node number,and fruit- branch number per plant reduced,while total dry matter weight per unit area increased. As plant density rose,the boll formation concentrated towards the upper part and inner of cotton plants,the number of bolls per plant decreased significantly,the boll weight,total boll number per unit area and unginned cotton yield per unit area all increased firstly and then decreased,and the rate of pre- frost flowers showed a rising trend.The optimum planting density of Zhongmiansuo 75 in coastal area was 36000 plant /hm2,and the highest unginned cotton yield4292. 0 kg /hm2 could be obtained under this condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density shortened the whole growth and developmental duration of cotton.

Treatment
plant density increasede2
Outcome
whole growth and developmental duratione1
Direction
shortenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the whole growth and developmental duration of cotton shortened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–336 · show in text ↑
e2

“when plant density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of cotton decreased first and then slightly increased with increasing planting density.

Treatment
plant density increasede2
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
decreased firstly and then slightly increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant height decreased firstly and then slightly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–395 · show in text ↑
e2

“when plant density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter weight per plant, total fruit-branch node number and fruit-branch number per plant were reduced with increasing planting density.

Treatment
plant density increasede2
Outcome
dry matter weight per plant,total fruit- branch node number,and fruit- branch number per plante1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dry matter weight per plant,total fruit- branch node number,and fruit- branch number per plant reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“when plant density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter weight per unit area of cotton increased with increasing planting density.

Treatment
plant density increasede2
Outcome
total dry matter weight per unit areae1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“while total dry matter weight per unit area increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“when plant density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of bolls per cotton plant decreased significantly as planting density rose.

Treatment
plant density rosee3
Outcome
number of bolls per plante1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of bolls per plant decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–711 · show in text ↑
e3

“As plant density rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll weight, total boll number per unit area and unginned cotton yield per unit area all increased first and then decreased as planting density rose.

Treatment
plant density rosee3
Outcome
boll weight,total boll number per unit area and unginned cotton yield per unit areae1
Direction
increased firstly and then decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the boll weight,total boll number per unit area and unginned cotton yield per unit area all increased firstly and then decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–840 · show in text ↑
e3

“As plant density rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of pre-frost flowers of cotton showed a rising trend as planting density rose.

Treatment
plant density rosee3
Outcome
rate of pre- frost flowerse1
Direction
rising trende1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the rate of pre- frost flowers showed a rising trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–897 · show in text ↑
e3

“As plant density rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll formation of cotton concentrated towards the upper part and inner of plants as planting density rose.

Organ / stage
upper part and inner of cotton plantse4
Treatment
plant density rosee3
Outcome
boll formatione4
Direction
concentrated towardse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“As plant density rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–575 · show in text ↑
e4

“the boll formation concentrated towards the upper part and inner of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum planting density of Zhongmiansuo 75 in the coastal area was 36000 plant /hm2.

Material
Zhongmiansuo 75e5
Outcome
optimum planting densitye5
Value
36000 plant /hm2e5
Setting
coastal areae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The optimum planting density of Zhongmiansuo 75 in coastal area was 36000 plant /hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest unginned cotton yield, 4292.0 kg/hm2, could be obtained at the optimum planting density.

Outcome
unginned cotton yielde6
Value
4292. 0 kg /hm2e6
Qualifier
under this conditione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the highest unginned cotton yield4292. 0 kg /hm2 could be obtained under this condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect- resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.