Paper · 2008

An Efficient Method to Select Transgenic Wheat with nptII Mark Gene

Ni Jianfu

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two methods(A and B)of selecting effect on transgenic wheat from immature seed and the mature seed with different concentration of Kanamycin are studied.Results showed that under sterile condition,younger seedlings of non-transgenic wheat from immature seed(A) could be refrained effectively by Kanamycin of 50 mg/L and wheat plants from mature seed(B) could be refrained by kanamycin of 80~100 mg/L.Compared to B,A was more sensitive to Kanamycin,has shorter selecting period and the result was more credible confirmed by PCR analysis.Therefore,A was an efficient selection method for transgenic wheat with nptⅡ mark gene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under sterile conditions, young non-transgenic wheat seedlings from immature seed (method A) were effectively inhibited by 50 mg/L kanamycin.

Organ / stage
younger seedlingse0
Outcome
refrained effectivelye0
Value
50 mg/Le0
Setting
sterile conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“under sterile condition,younger seedlings of non-transgenic wheat from immature seed(A) could be refrained effectively by Kanamycin of 50 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–315 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plants from mature seed (method B) were inhibited by 80-100 mg/L kanamycin.

Outcome
could be refrainede0
Value
80~100 mg/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat plants from mature seed(B) could be refrained by kanamycin of 80~100 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–399 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Method A was more sensitive to kanamycin than method B.

Outcome
more sensitive to Kanamycine0
Comparator
Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to B,A was more sensitive to Kanamycin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–447 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Method A had a shorter selecting period than method B.

Outcome
shorter selecting periode0
Comparator
Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to B,A was more sensitive to Kanamycin,has shorter selecting period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–476 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With method A the selection result was more credible, as confirmed by PCR analysis, than with method B.

Outcome
more credible confirmed by PCR analysise0
Comparator
Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to B,A was more sensitive to Kanamycin,has shorter selecting period and the result was more credible confirmed by PCR analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–535 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that method A is an efficient selection method for transgenic wheat with the nptII marker gene.

Outcome
efficient selection methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A was an efficient selection method for transgenic wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–602 · show in text ↑