Paper · 2011 · Shengtaixue zazhi

Root characteristics under different grazing intensities in Stipa krylovii steppe

Luo Wen-tao; Yunna Wu; Fengjie Zhang; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking three succession plant communities in Hulunbeier Stipa krylovii steppe under different grazing intensities as test objects,this paper studied the underground biomass and root morphological characteristics of the communities and their constructive species.With increasing grazing intensity,both the community species composition and the root functional group types tended to be simplified.The underground biomass of the three communities presented a T-shape spatial distribution.The constructive species of the communities under different grazing intensities had an obvious substitution,with S.krylovii,Cleistogenes squarrosa and Allium polyrhizum as the constructive species under light,moderate and heavy grazing,and the root/shoot ratios of the constructive species decreased with increasing grazing intensity,being 0.47,1.0,and 4.1 under light,moderate and heavy grazing,respectively.The root number,root volume,root biomass,specific root length,and root length density also varied with different grazing intensities.Moreover,the root/shoot ratio and the specific root length showed a significant correlation with the content of soil available nitrogen(P0.05).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species composition simplified with increasing grazing intensity.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Treatment
increasing grazing intensitye0
Outcome
community species compositione0
Direction
simplifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing grazing intensity,both the community species composition and the root functional group types tended to be simplified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root functional group types simplified with increasing grazing intensity.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Treatment
increasing grazing intensitye0
Outcome
root functional group typese0
Direction
simplifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing grazing intensity,both the community species composition and the root functional group types tended to be simplified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Underground biomass of the three communities had a T-shape spatial distribution.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Organ / stage
undergrounde0
Outcome
T-shape spatial distributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The underground biomass of the three communities presented a T-shape spatial distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. krylovii was constructive under light grazing.

Taxon
S.kryloviiStipa kryloviie0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
constructive species under lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S.krylovii,Cleistogenes squarrosa and Allium polyrhizum as the constructive species under light,moderate and heavy grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–720 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleistogenes squarrosa was constructive under moderate grazing.

Taxon
Cleistogenes squarrosaCleistogenes squarrosae0
Treatment
moderatee0
Outcome
constructive species under light,moderate and heavy grazinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cleistogenes squarrosa
Cleistogenes squarrosa · TaxonDmitriy Bochkov · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S.krylovii,Cleistogenes squarrosa and Allium polyrhizum as the constructive species under light,moderate and heavy grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–720 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allium polyrhizum was constructive under heavy grazing.

Taxon
Allium polyrhizumAllium polyrhizume0
Treatment
heavye0
Outcome
constructive species under light,moderate and heavy grazinge0

Verbatim

e0

“S.krylovii,Cleistogenes squarrosa and Allium polyrhizum as the constructive species under light,moderate and heavy grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–720 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root to shoot ratios of constructive species decreased with increasing grazing intensity.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Treatment
increasing grazing intensitye0
Outcome
root/shoot ratiose0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
being 0.47,1.0,and 4.1 under light,moderate and heavy grazing,respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root/shoot ratios of the constructive species decreased with increasing grazing intensity,being 0.47,1.0,and 4.1 under light,moderate and heavy grazing,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root number, volume, biomass, specific root length and root length density varied by grazing intensity.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Treatment
different grazing intensitiese0
Outcome
root number,root volume,root biomasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root number,root volume,root biomass,specific root length,and root length density also varied with different grazing intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root to shoot ratio correlated significantly with soil available nitrogen.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Compound
soil available nitrogene0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root/shoot ratio and the specific root length showed a significant correlation with the content of soil available nitrogen(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific root length correlated significantly with soil available nitrogen.

Taxon
Stipa kryloviiStipa kryloviit0
Compound
soil available nitrogene0
Outcome
specific root lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa krylovii
Stipa krylovii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root/shoot ratio and the specific root length showed a significant correlation with the content of soil available nitrogen(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa krylovii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑