Abstract
The CT-4S and CT-2S model transplanting machines were imported by Baotou Huazi Industrial Co., Ltd. from Japan for testing paper-pot nursery in 2002 and 2003. The results showed that the transplanting quality and efficiency of the two model machines were related to ground level and soil texture and ploughing quality, as well as the seedling size, leaves and growth vigour. The transplanting efficiency is about 0.50ha/h and 0.28ha/h and 15～25 times in comparison with manual work when the machines work on good tilth field, the sugar beet seedling age is in 25～30 days, and the health plant height is less than 7 cm. Moreover, the CT-2S model is better than the model of CT-4S in transplanting quality, although the tow machines are applied to beet production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting quality and efficiency varied with soil, tillage and seedling conditions.
- Taxon
- Beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Outcome
- transplanting quality and efficiencye0
- Setting
- ground level and soil texture and ploughing qualitye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the transplanting quality and efficiency of the two model machines were related to ground level and soil texture and ploughing quality, as well as the seedling size, leaves and growth vigour.”
t0“Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
CT-4S transplanting efficiency was about 0.50ha/h under the stated field and seedling conditions.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Outcome
- transplanting efficiencye0
- Value
- 0.50ha/he0
- Qualifier
- good tilth fielde0
- Comparator
- manual worke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The transplanting efficiency is about 0.50ha/h and 0.28ha/h and 15～25 times in comparison with manual work when the machines work on good tilth field, the sugar beet seedling age is in 25～30 days, and the health plant height is less than 7 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
CT-2S transplanting efficiency was about 0.28ha/h under the stated field and seedling conditions.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Outcome
- transplanting efficiencye0
- Value
- 0.28ha/he0
- Comparator
- manual worke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The transplanting efficiency is about 0.50ha/h and 0.28ha/h and 15～25 times in comparison with manual work when the machines work on good tilth field, the sugar beet seedling age is in 25～30 days, and the health plant height is less than 7 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Machine transplanting was 15～25 times as efficient as manual work under stated conditions.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Outcome
- transplanting efficiencye0
- Value
- 15～25 timese0
- Comparator
- manual worke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The transplanting efficiency is about 0.50ha/h and 0.28ha/h and 15～25 times in comparison with manual work when the machines work on good tilth field, the sugar beet seedling age is in 25～30 days, and the health plant height is less than 7 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
CT-2S had better transplanting quality than CT-4S.
- Taxon
- BeetBeta vulgarist0
- Outcome
- transplanting qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- model of CT-4Se0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the CT-2S model is better than the model of CT-4S in transplanting quality”
t0“Beet”