Paper · 2006 · Yumi kexue

Definition and Calculation of Uniformity of Plant Distribution in Crops Field

MA Rui-kun

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this paper,the definition and computation of uniformity of plant distribution was given to describe quantitatively the plant distribution in crops field.Honeycombed arrangement of plants in the field is the most uniform planting pattern,for which distances in the vicinity of plants are all the same(including with the plant of different row in the vicinity).Therefore,the uniformity of plant distribution could be defined as percentage of an approximation to the honeycombed arrangement in the field.When a planting density is given,the uniformity of plant distribution could be obtained by calculating the uniformity deviation coefficient between the actual planting distance and the theoretical plant distance derived from the honeycombed arrangement.It is a composite index of planting pattern what it covers planting density,patterns of row spacing and plant spacing,and plant position in row,and is much better than row spacing only to reflect the status of crop arrangement in the field.It could provide a new priority to better understand the relationship between planting pattern and yield.And also,the integrated effects of row spacing and planting density on uniformity of distribution was analyzed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honeycombed field arrangement was identified as the most uniform planting pattern.

Taxon
cropst0
Outcome
most uniform planting patterne0

Verbatim

e0

“Honeycombed arrangement of plants in the field is the most uniform planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Uniformity can be calculated from deviation between actual and theoretical honeycombed planting distances.

Taxon
cropst0
Outcome
uniformity of plant distributione0
Comparator
theoretical plant distancee0

Verbatim

e0

“the uniformity of plant distribution could be obtained by calculating the uniformity deviation coefficient between the actual planting distance and the theoretical plant distance derived from the honeycombed arrangement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The composite index covers density, row and plant spacing, and plant position and better reflects field arrangement than row spacing alone.

Taxon
cropst0
Outcome
status of crop arrangement in the fielde0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
row spacing onlye0

Verbatim

e0

“It is a composite index of planting pattern what it covers planting density,patterns of row spacing and plant spacing,and plant position in row,and is much better than row spacing only to reflect the status of crop arrangement in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑