Paper · 2009 · Huazhong Nongye Daxue xuebao

Genetic Analysis and Seedling Selection of the Poplar Progenies of Aigeiros Section

Du KeBing

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crosses were performed using superior poplar clones of aigeiros section widely cultivated in Hubei Province to breed new poplar clones.The progenies showed abundant genetic variation and obvious heterosis.Both seedling height and root-collar diameter were traits with high heritability.Heritability in the broad sense of one-year old seedlings with one-year old roots in height and root-collar diameter were 76.74% and 5.22%,respectively.The general combining ability and specific combining ability of height were 21.56% and 78.44%,respectively.Those abilities of root-collar diameter were 61.39% and 38.61%.All of them were consistent with the one-year old seedlings with two-year old roots.Poplar resistances to the rust disease,canker and longicom beetles were polygenic.The resistance of progenies in rust disease was obviously related with their parents,but this kind relativity did not occur in resistance of canker and longicom beetles.According to growth of widely cultivated clones,obvious heterosis of higher-parent and genetic gain could be obtained after primary selection.Some progenies grew more rapid than the widely cultivated clones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar progenies showed abundant genetic variation and heterosis.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Outcome
abundant genetic variation and obvious heterosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progenies showed abundant genetic variation and obvious heterosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height broad-sense heritability in one year seedlings was 76.74%.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Organ / stage
one-year old seedlings with one-year old rootse0
Outcome
heighte0
Value
76.74%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heritability in the broad sense of one-year old seedlings with one-year old roots in height and root-collar diameter were 76.74% and 5.22%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root collar diameter broad-sense heritability in one year seedlings was 5.22%.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Organ / stage
one-year old seedlings with one-year old rootse0
Outcome
root-collar diametere0
Value
5.22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heritability in the broad sense of one-year old seedlings with one-year old roots in height and root-collar diameter were 76.74% and 5.22%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

General combining ability for height was 21.56%.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
general combining abilitye0
Value
21.56%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The general combining ability and specific combining ability of height were 21.56% and 78.44%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific combining ability for height was 78.44%.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
specific combining abilitye0
Value
78.44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The general combining ability and specific combining ability of height were 21.56% and 78.44%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

General combining ability for root collar diameter was 61.39%.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Outcome
root-collar diametere0
Value
61.39%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those abilities of root-collar diameter were 61.39% and 38.61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific combining ability for root collar diameter was 38.61%.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Outcome
root-collar diametere0
Value
38.61%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those abilities of root-collar diameter were 61.39% and 38.61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported ability pattern was consistent in one year seedlings with two year roots.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Outcome
consistent with the one-year old seedlings with two-year old rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All of them were consistent with the one-year old seedlings with two-year old roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar resistance to rust disease was polygenic.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse0
Interactor
rust diseasee0pathogen
Outcome
resistances to the rust diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poplar resistances to the rust disease,canker and longicom beetles were polygenic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar resistance to canker was polygenic.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse0
Interactor
cankere0pathogen
Outcome
cankere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poplar resistances to the rust disease,canker and longicom beetles were polygenic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar resistance to longicom beetles was polygenic.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse0
Interactor
longicom beetlese0pest
Outcome
longicom beetlese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poplar resistances to the rust disease,canker and longicom beetles were polygenic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–773 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust disease resistance in progenies was related to parental resistance.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Interactor
rust diseasee0pathogen
Outcome
resistance of progenies in rust diseasee0
Comparator
their parentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The resistance of progenies in rust disease was obviously related with their parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canker resistance in progenies did not show the parental relationship.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Interactor
cankere0pathogen
Outcome
resistance of cankere0
Direction
did not occure0
Qualifier
this kind relativitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this kind relativity did not occur in resistance of canker and longicom beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longicom beetle resistance in progenies did not show the parental relationship.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Interactor
longicom beetlese0pest
Outcome
longicom beetlese0
Direction
did not occure0
Qualifier
this kind relativitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this kind relativity did not occur in resistance of canker and longicom beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary selection yielded higher parent heterosis and genetic gain based on cultivated clone growth.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
primary selectione0
Outcome
obvious heterosis of higher-parent and genetic gaine0
Comparator
widely cultivated clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to growth of widely cultivated clones,obvious heterosis of higher-parent and genetic gain could be obtained after primary selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some progenies grew more rapidly than widely cultivated clones.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Outcome
grew more rapide0
Direction
more rapide0
Comparator
widely cultivated clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some progenies grew more rapid than the widely cultivated clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑