Paper · 2014 · Dongbei Nongye Daxue xuebao

Research on the ultrasonic extraction and inhibiting activity of herbicidal active substances of germinated wheat

Bai Jingwe

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Single factor test and L9(34) orthogonal design were used to study the extraction of the active substances inhibiting the germination and growth of cucumber from germinated wheat, and the effects of ultrasonic time, ultrasonic power, ultrasonic temperature and liquid- solid ratio were investigated by the tracking means of germination inhibition rate of cucumber. The results showed that the primary and secondary factors to impact the extraction of active substances from germinated wheat were as follows, ultrasonic temperatureultrasonic timeliquid- solid ratioultrasonic power. The optimum extraction conditions determined through orthogonal tests were extraction temperature 50 ℃, ultrasonic time 40 min, liquid-solid ratio 20, ultrasonic power 400 W, and the test was stable and reliable by six parallel tests verification, compared with the control experiments, cucumber germination inhibition rate was 63.64%. There were different degrees of inhibition on the growth of cucumber when the concentration of the active substance reached 4 mg· mL- 1, and the inhibitory effect were the strongest on fresh weight and root fresh weight of cucumber.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized wheat extract inhibited cucumber germination by 63.64% relative to control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
germinated wheate1
Outcome
cucumber germination inhibition ratee0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
63.64%e0
Comparator
control experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the control experiments, cucumber germination inhibition rate was 63.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“the active substances inhibiting the germination and growth of cucumber from germinated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 mg· mL- 1, the substance inhibited cucumber growth, most strongly fresh weight and root fresh weight.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
active substancee0
Outcome
fresh weight and root fresh weight of cucumbere0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
4 mg· mL- 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were different degrees of inhibition on the growth of cucumber when the concentration of the active substance reached 4 mg· mL- 1, and the inhibitory effect were the strongest on fresh weight and root fresh weight of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1149 · show in text ↑

stage · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.