Abstract
The effects of farmyard manure of different sources and commercial organic fertilizer on tobacco growth and output value were studied in organic farming conditions.The results showed that the effect of the treatment JYK(chicken manure + oil cake + mineral powder) was better than those of the treatment S(commercial organic fertilizer),YYK(sheep manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) and JK(chicken manure + mineral potassium powder) on the soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases,but there was no significant difference(P0.05).In organic farming conditions,the effect of treatment NYK(cattle manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) on soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases and output value was significantly worse(P0.05) or worse than those of S,YYK,JK,JYK.Therefore,treatment JYK is the best fertility for organic farming,treatment NYK of fertility might not be applied to organic farming.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment JYK was better than treatment S (commercial organic fertilizer) on soil improvement, field tobacco growing and pest and disease occurrence, but the difference was not significant.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“the effect of the treatment JYK(chicken manure + oil cake + mineral powder) was better than those of the treatment S(commercial organic fertilizer),YYK(sheep manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) and JK(chicken manure + mineral potassium powder) on the soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases,but there was no significant difference(P0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment JYK was better than treatment YYK (sheep manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) on soil improvement, field tobacco growing and pest and disease occurrence, but the difference was not significant.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“the effect of the treatment JYK(chicken manure + oil cake + mineral powder) was better than those of the treatment S(commercial organic fertilizer),YYK(sheep manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) and JK(chicken manure + mineral potassium powder) on the soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases,but there was no significant difference(P0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment JYK was better than treatment JK (chicken manure + mineral potassium powder) on soil improvement, field tobacco growing and pest and disease occurrence, but the difference was not significant.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“the effect of the treatment JYK(chicken manure + oil cake + mineral powder) was better than those of the treatment S(commercial organic fertilizer),YYK(sheep manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) and JK(chicken manure + mineral potassium powder) on the soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases,but there was no significant difference(P0.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment NYK (cattle manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) was significantly worse than S, YYK, JK and JYK on soil improvement, field tobacco growing and pest and disease occurrence.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“the effect of treatment NYK(cattle manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) on soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases and output value was significantly worse(P0.05) or worse than those of S,YYK,JK,JYK”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment NYK gave significantly worse tobacco output value than S, YYK, JK and JYK.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“the effect of treatment NYK(cattle manure + oil cake + mineral potassium powder) on soil improvement,field tobacco growing,the occurrence of pests and diseases and output value was significantly worse(P0.05) or worse than those of S,YYK,JK,JYK”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude treatment JYK is the best fertility treatment for organic tobacco farming.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“treatment JYK is the best fertility for organic farming”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude treatment NYK might not be applied to organic tobacco farming.
Verbatim
t0“Flue-cured Tobacco”
e1“treatment NYK of fertility might not be applied to organic farming”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
botanical · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →botanical · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →potassium · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 187 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
210 papers more in this group
See all 214 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.