Paper · 2015 · Xibei zhiwu xuebao

Comparison of the Structure Slice of Mature Maize Stalks

Xi Wang

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The maize stalk of the third internode in the maturity stage is used as the research material.The research uses four ways,such as free-hand sectioning,frozen sectioning,paraffin sectioning,thin sectioning and compares the quality of the slice of different methods.This research lays the technical foundation for studying the relationship between the structure of maize stalks and lodging.The results show that freehand sectioning method for getting the structure slice of mature maize stalks is a relatively convenient and rapid method,and the area of slice is relatively big.The slice is suitable for a wide range of observation and statistics.Frozen sectioning is a fast way to get the slice of mature maize stalks,and the area of slice is relatively small and the slice is suitable for a small range of observation.Thin sectioning is a good way to get perfect slice.It fits for high multiple microscope observation and small range of SEM observation to observe tissue structures,but the slice area is too small.Paraffin sectioning is not suitable for getting the structure slice of mature maize stalks.The research suggests that free-hand sectioning method is the most suitable way for observation and study of the structure of mature maize stalks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freehand sectioning produced mature maize stalk slices conveniently and rapidly with relatively large area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
mature maize stalkse0
Outcome
relatively convenient and rapid method,and the area of slice is relatively bige0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“freehand sectioning method for getting the structure slice of mature maize stalks is a relatively convenient and rapid method,and the area of slice is relatively big”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–575 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freehand slices were suitable for broad observation and statistics.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
suitable for a wide range of observation and statisticse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The slice is suitable for a wide range of observation and statistics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Stalks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frozen sectioning was fast but gave relatively small slices for small range observation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
area of slice is relatively small and the slice is suitable for a small range of observatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frozen sectioning is a fast way to get the slice of mature maize stalks,and the area of slice is relatively small and the slice is suitable for a small range of observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–817 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thin sectioning produced a good slice for high magnification microscopy and small range SEM observation, but its area was too small.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
perfect slicee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thin sectioning is a good way to get perfect slice.It fits for high multiple microscope observation and small range of SEM observation to observe tissue structures,but the slice area is too small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Stalks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraffin sectioning was unsuitable for mature maize stalk structural slices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
not suitable for getting the structure slicee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paraffin sectioning is not suitable for getting the structure slice of mature maize stalks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Freehand sectioning was recommended for observing mature maize stalk structure.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
free-hand sectioning method is the most suitable way for observation and study of the structuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“free-hand sectioning method is the most suitable way for observation and study of the structure of mature maize stalks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1250 · show in text ↑