Paper · 2012 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Study on the technology of drip-fertigation to winter-planting potato in Guangdong

HU Gui-hong

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Drip-fertigation and traditional cultivation were compared for the effects on the growth of potato under field conditions.The results showed that drip-fertigation significantly increased potato tuber yield by 29.68%~33.04%,thereby significantly increasing the economic benefit;the net income per 667m2 of the treatment that drip-fertigation without hilling up was higher than the treatment which with by 9.8%,in the case that the ouput didn't reduce.These results layed a sound foundation for extension of the drip-fertigation technique in winter-planting potato production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation significantly increased potato tuber yield by 29.68%~33.04%.

Treatment
drip-fertigatione0
Outcome
potato tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.68%~33.04%e0
Comparator
traditional cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip-fertigation and traditional cultivation were compared for the effects on the growth of potato under field conditions.The results showed that drip-fertigation significantly increased potato tuber yield by 29.68%~33.04%,thereby significantly increasing the economic benefit;the net income per 667m2 of the treatment that drip-fertigation without hilling up was higher than the treatment which with by 9.8%,in the case that the ouput didn't reduce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation significantly increased economic benefit.

Treatment
drip-fertigatione0
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip-fertigation and traditional cultivation were compared for the effects on the growth of potato under field conditions.The results showed that drip-fertigation significantly increased potato tuber yield by 29.68%~33.04%,thereby significantly increasing the economic benefit;the net income per 667m2 of the treatment that drip-fertigation without hilling up was higher than the treatment which with by 9.8%,in the case that the ouput didn't reduce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation without hilling had 9.8% higher net income than with hilling.

Treatment
drip-fertigation without hilling upe0
Outcome
net income per 667m2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.8%e0
Comparator
treatment which withe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip-fertigation and traditional cultivation were compared for the effects on the growth of potato under field conditions.The results showed that drip-fertigation significantly increased potato tuber yield by 29.68%~33.04%,thereby significantly increasing the economic benefit;the net income per 667m2 of the treatment that drip-fertigation without hilling up was higher than the treatment which with by 9.8%,in the case that the ouput didn't reduce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing hilling did not reduce output under drip fertigation.

Treatment
drip-fertigation without hilling upe0
Outcome
oupute0
Direction
didn't reducee0
Comparator
treatment which withe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip-fertigation and traditional cultivation were compared for the effects on the growth of potato under field conditions.The results showed that drip-fertigation significantly increased potato tuber yield by 29.68%~33.04%,thereby significantly increasing the economic benefit;the net income per 667m2 of the treatment that drip-fertigation without hilling up was higher than the treatment which with by 9.8%,in the case that the ouput didn't reduce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–450 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.