Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF TUSCAN CHESTNUT GERMPLASM: GENETIC AND GENOTYPIC VARIATION AMONG POPULATIONS OF THREE DIFFERENT AREAS

C. Cantini; A. Autino

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study was conducted to characterize 131 chestnut plants collected in three different areals of the Tuscany region (Garfagnana, Colline Metallifere, Amiata). The three areals are well separated without continuous chestnut presence. Molecular analysis was performed with 8 microsatellite markers. The 131 plants belonged to 39 names, only 1 of which was present in all the tree population while 4 were present in two population. The results of the fingerprinting showed that identical genotypes were present only within each population. The final number of genotypes was set to 102, once eliminated homonyms and synonyms. The three presented populations differed at the genetic level, although the plants of Colline Metallifere and Amiata shared some alleles. At the genotypic level the three populations differed statistically. Hence, the populations presented different genetic pools and may represent independent sources of variation in breeding. For one of the loci a high level of homozygosity was found in all the populations suggesting a possible correlation between this marker and a gene selective against heterozygosis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 131 chestnut plants represented 39 names.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
namese0
Value
39e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The 131 plants belonged to 39 names”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one chestnut name occurred in all three populations.

Taxon
treee0
Outcome
present in all the tree populatione0
Value
1e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“only 1 of which was present in all the tree population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Identical chestnut genotypes occurred only within populations.

Outcome
identical genotypese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“identical genotypes were present only within each population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After removing homonyms and synonyms, 102 chestnut genotypes remained.

Outcome
genotypese0
Value
102e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The final number of genotypes was set to 102, once eliminated homonyms and synonyms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–623 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colline Metallifere and Amiata chestnuts shared some alleles.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
shared some allelese0
Setting
Colline Metallifere and Amiatae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the plants of Colline Metallifere and Amiata shared some alleles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three chestnut populations differed statistically at the genotypic level.

Outcome
genotypic levele0
Direction
differede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At the genotypic level the three populations differed statistically.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–830 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The populations may provide independent genetic variation for breeding.

Outcome
independent sources of variation in breedinge0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the populations presented different genetic pools and may represent independent sources of variation in breeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One locus had high homozygosity in all populations.

Outcome
homozygositye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“For one of the loci a high level of homozygosity was found in all the populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1033 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The homozygous locus may be linked to a gene selecting against heterozygotes.

Gene
a gene selective against heterozygosise0
Outcome
possible correlatione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting a possible correlation between this marker and a gene selective against heterozygosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1131 · show in text ↑