Paper · 2015 · Genetics and Molecular Research

Agro-ecological variations of sheath rot disease of rice caused by Sarocladium oryzae and DNA fingerprinting of the pathogen’s population structure

M. Tajul Islam Chowdhury; M. Salim Mian; M.A. Taher Mia; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To examine the impact of regional and seasonal variations on the incidence and severity of sheath rot, a major seed-borne disease of rice caused by Sarocladium oryzae, data on incidence and severity were collected from 27 selected fields in the Gazipur, Rangpur, Bogra, Chittagong, Comilla, Gopalgonj, Jessore, Manikgonj, and Bhola districts of Bangladesh in rain-fed and irrigated conditions. Cultural variability of 29 pathogen isolates obtained from 8 different locations was studied on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and genetic variability was determined by DNA fingerprinting using variable number tandem repeat-polymerase chain reaction markers. Overall, disease incidence and severity were higher in irrigated rice. Disease incidence and severity were highest in the Bhola district in rain-fed rice and lowest in irrigated rice. Mycelial growth of 29 representative isolates was found to vary on PDA and the isolates were divided into 6 groups. The range of the overall size of conidia of the selected isolates was 2.40-7.20 x 1.20-2.40 μm. Analysis of the DNA fingerprint types of the 29 isolates of S. oryzae, obtained from the amplification reactions, revealed 10 fingerprinting types (FPTs) that were 80% similar. FPT-1 was the largest group and included 13 isolates (44.8%), while FPT-2 was the third largest group and included 3 isolates. Each of FPT-3, 4, 5, and 6 included only 1 isolate. We observed no relationship between cultural and genetic groupings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice sheath rot incidence and severity were higher under irrigation than rain-fed conditions.

Interactor
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
irrigated ricee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · InteractorDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, disease incidence and severity were higher in irrigated rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice caused by Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Bhola, rice sheath rot incidence and severity were highest in rain-fed rice and lowest in irrigated rice.

Interactor
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Bhola districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · InteractorDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence and severity were highest in the Bhola district in rain-fed rice and lowest in irrigated rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice caused by Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of 29 Sarocladium isolates varied on PDA and formed six groups.

Taxon
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0
Outcome
Mycelial growthe0
Value
6 groupse0
Setting
PDAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycelial growth of 29 representative isolates was found to vary on PDA and the isolates were divided into 6 groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected Sarocladium isolates had conidia sized 2.40-7.20 x 1.20-2.40 μm.

Taxon
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0
Outcome
size of conidiae0
Value
2.40-7.20 x 1.20-2.40 μme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range of the overall size of conidia of the selected isolates was 2.40-7.20 x 1.20-2.40 μm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA fingerprinting distinguished ten Sarocladium types at 80% similarity.

Taxon
S. oryzaeSarocladium oryzaee0
Outcome
fingerprinting types (FPTs)e0
Value
10 fingerprinting typese0
Qualifier
80% similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of the DNA fingerprint types of the 29 isolates of S. oryzae, obtained from the amplification reactions, revealed 10 fingerprinting types (FPTs) that were 80% similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPT-1 included 13 isolates, or 44.8%.

Taxon
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0
Outcome
FPT-1 was the largest groupe0
Value
13 isolates (44.8%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FPT-1 was the largest group and included 13 isolates (44.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPT-2 included three isolates.

Taxon
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0
Outcome
FPT-2 was the third largest groupe0
Value
3 isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FPT-2 was the third largest group and included 3 isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPT-3, FPT-4, FPT-5 and FPT-6 each included one isolate.

Taxon
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0
Outcome
FPT-3, 4, 5, and 6e0
Value
1 isolatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each of FPT-3, 4, 5, and 6 included only 1 isolate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultural and genetic isolate groupings were unrelated.

Taxon
Sarocladium oryzaeSarocladium oryzaet0
Outcome
relationship between cultural and genetic groupingse0
Comparator
cultural and genetic groupingse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sarocladium oryzae
Sarocladium oryzae · TaxonDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed no relationship between cultural and genetic groupings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sarocladium oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–85 · show in text ↑