Paper · 2005 · Acta Horticulturae

RADIOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF BIODEGRADABLE FILMS FOR HORTICULTURAL PROTECTED CULTIVATION

G. Vox; E. Schettini; G. Scarascia-Mugnozza

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of low-density polyethylene plastic films for soil mulching and greenhouse covering has been increasing significantly in the world. In order to overcome the environmental pollution due to the huge consumption of plastics and to the consequent waste production, innovative biodegradable materials have been introduced to replace traditional plastic films. Biodegradable films can be disposed directly in the soil or in composting plant. Biodegradable films are innovative materials, as a consequence their physical properties must be evaluated in order to assess if they meet the agricultural requirements. In the present research the radiometric properties of innovative biodegradable starch based films were tested in laboratory and during experimental field tests. The biodegradable films were used as low tunnel covering and mulching films in a melon cultivation in Southern Italy. Two black biodegradable and one transparent mulching film were used in combination with two biodegradable films for low tunnel covering. Low density polyethylene films were used for comparison too. Radiometric tests carried out by means of spectrophotometers on the biodegradable films for low tunnel covering showed values of the solar transmissivity coefficient between 86 and 87% and values of the long wave infrared coefficient ranging from 10 to 16%. The yield of melon obtained using biodegradable films was comparable with the yield obtained using LDPE films, especially using the black mulching film rather than transparent mulching films.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon yield under biodegradable films was comparable to yield under LDPE films.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
biodegradable filmse0
Outcome
yield of melone0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
LDPE filmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of melon obtained using biodegradable films was comparable with the yield obtained using LDPE films”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black mulching film gave a more favorable melon yield comparison than transparent mulching films.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
black mulching filme0
Outcome
yield of melone0
Direction
especiallye0
Comparator
transparent mulching filmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of melon obtained using biodegradable films was comparable with the yield obtained using LDPE films, especially using the black mulching film rather than transparent mulching films.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1540 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 37 positive, 7 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.