Paper · 2014 · PubMed

[Effects of grazing on spatial distribution relationships between constructive and dominant species in Stipa breviflora desert steppe].

Shi-jie Lyu; Hong-mei Liu; Yan-ling Wu; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of grazing on spatial distribution relationships of constructive species (Stipa breviflora) and dominant species (Cleistogenes songorica and Allium polyrhizum) in the desert steppe were analyzed by different analysis methods. The results showed that the landscape characteristic of S. breviflora + C. songorica + A. polyrhizum community was mainly affected by soil properties and inherent properties of populations. The spatial distribution variability influenced by continuous grazing (CG) was in order of A. polyrhizum > C. songorica > S. breviflora. The influence of CG upon the density of S. breviflora and A. polyrhizum was notable, while little influence upon the density of C. songorica was observed. S. breviflora density increased with the increasing C. songorica density in CG area, whereas it increased firstly and then decreased with the increasing C. songorica density in enclosed area (CK). S. breviflora density decreased with the increasing A. polyrhizum density in CG and CK area. It was concluded that there was density effect for plant interspecific relationships which could disappear with the presence of outside interference. Plant interspecific relationships were multiple with the difference in populations or interference conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and population properties mainly affected the landscape characteristics of the three species community.

Taxon
S. brevifloraStipa breviflorae0
Outcome
landscape characteristice0
Qualifier
inherent properties of populationse0
Setting
soil propertiese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the landscape characteristic of S. breviflora + C. songorica + A. polyrhizum community was mainly affected by soil properties and inherent properties of populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under continuous grazing, spatial distribution variability ranked highest in A. polyrhizum, then C. songorica, then S. breviflora.

Taxon
A. polyrhizumAllium polyrhizume0
Treatment
continuous grazing (CG)e0
Outcome
spatial distribution variabilitye0
Qualifier
A. polyrhizum > C. songorica > S. breviflorae0

Verbatim

e0

“The spatial distribution variability influenced by continuous grazing (CG) was in order of A. polyrhizum > C. songorica > S. breviflora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–564 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous grazing notably influenced S. breviflora density.

Taxon
S. brevifloraStipa breviflorae0
Treatment
CGe0
Outcome
density of S. breviflorae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of CG upon the density of S. breviflora and A. polyrhizum was notable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–648 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous grazing notably influenced A. polyrhizum density.

Taxon
A. polyrhizumAllium polyrhizume0
Treatment
CGe0
Outcome
density of S. breviflora and A. polyrhizume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of CG upon the density of S. breviflora and A. polyrhizum was notable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–648 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous grazing had little influence on C. songorica density.

Taxon
C. songoricaCleistogenes songoricae0
Treatment
little influencee0
Outcome
density of C. songoricae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“little influence upon the density of C. songorica was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–718 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the continuously grazed area, S. breviflora density rose with C. songorica density.

Taxon
S. brevifloraStipa breviflorae0
Interactor
C. songoricaCleistogenes songoricae0other
Outcome
S. breviflora densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
CG areae0

Verbatim

e0

“S. breviflora density increased with the increasing C. songorica density in CG area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–803 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the enclosed area, S. breviflora density rose then fell as C. songorica density rose.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Interactor
C. songoricaCleistogenes songoricae0other
Outcome
increased firstly and then decreasede0
Direction
increased firstly and then decreasede0
Setting
enclosed area (CK)e0

Verbatim

e0

“it increased firstly and then decreased with the increasing C. songorica density in enclosed area (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa breviflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. breviflora density declined with rising A. polyrhizum density in both grazed and enclosed areas.

Taxon
S. brevifloraStipa breviflorae0
Interactor
A. polyrhizumAllium polyrhizume0other
Outcome
S. breviflora densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
CG and CK areae0

Verbatim

e0

“S. breviflora density decreased with the increasing A. polyrhizum density in CG and CK area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1009 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that external interference can eliminate the density effect in interspecific plant relationships.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
density effect for plant interspecific relationshipse0
Qualifier
outside interferencee0

Verbatim

e0

“there was density effect for plant interspecific relationships which could disappear with the presence of outside interference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa breviflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that interspecific plant relationships varied by population and interference conditions.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
Plant interspecific relationships were multiplee0
Qualifier
difference in populations or interference conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant interspecific relationships were multiple with the difference in populations or interference conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stipa breviflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑