Paper · 1989 · Weed Science

Competitive Interactions of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Wild Oats (Avena fatua) Grown at Different Densities

David W. Cudney; Lowell S. Jordan; Jodie S. Holt; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Competitive interactions of wheat and wild oats in relation to variations in plant density of both species were investigated in field studies under irrigation and added fertilizer. Competition studies included comparisons by both additive and replacement series. The additive series was used to study plant responses to competition under fixed density of wheat and increasing density of wild oats. The replacement series was used to study plant responses to competition under constant total plant density with differing proportions of wheat and wild oats. On a per plant basis, shoot dry weight and leaf area index of wild oats were less than those of wheat at anthesis. However, the replacement series experiment indicated that wheat and wild oats were equivalent in competitiveness. Relative density of wild oats gave a better regression fit for wheat yield than did absolute wild oats density (r 2 values of 0.83 and 0.61, respectively). Yield of wheat grain was linearly proportional to relative density of wild oats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At anthesis, wild oats had less shoot dry weight per plant than wheat.

Taxon
wild oatsAvenae0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On a per plant basis, shoot dry weight and leaf area index of wild oats were less than those of wheat at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At anthesis, wild oats had less leaf area index per plant than wheat.

Taxon
wild oatsAvenae0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On a per plant basis, shoot dry weight and leaf area index of wild oats were less than those of wheat at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and wild oats were equally competitive in the replacement series.

Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
equivalent in competitivenesse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
wild oatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the replacement series experiment indicated that wheat and wild oats were equivalent in competitiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative wild oat density fit wheat yield better than absolute wild oat density.

Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
regression fit for wheat yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Value
0.83e0
Qualifier
0.61e0
Comparator
absolute wild oats densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative density of wild oats gave a better regression fit for wheat yield than did absolute wild oats density (r 2 values of 0.83 and 0.61, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–939 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was linearly proportional to relative wild oat density.

Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
Yield of wheat graine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of wheat grain was linearly proportional to relative density of wild oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1020 · show in text ↑