Paper · 2015 · The Journal Agriculture and Forestry

FITTING CROPPING TECHNOLOGY IN A CHANGING CLIMATE

Vesna DRAGICEVIC; Branka KRESOVIC; Zivorad VIDENOVIC; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Maize is one of the most important crops in the world. Its successful production depends mainly on meteorological factors. The aim of study was to define the most efficient tillage system (no-till, reduced or conventional tillage) and fertilizer amount (, 330 or 660 kg ha -1 of N:P:K) for high maize yields (ZP 704) under rain-fed and irrigation conditions, according to the results of a longterm maize cropping experiment (1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). The observed 20 year period was characterized by increasing trends of the average temperatures and sum of precipitation. A positive dependence between grain yield and precipitation was noticed only under rain-fed cropping. Weibull analysis emphasised that the highest yields were achieved with 330 kg ha -1 of N:P:K fertilizer and conventional tillage under unfavourable conditions. Negative meteorological factors were diminished under irrigation, where high inputs resulted in increased yields. However, rain-fed cropping is still the most abundant cropping practice in the world, and moderate inputs (330 kg ha -1 N:P:K) resulted in stability of the maize yield, regardless of the lower yields achieved. On the other hand, the high yields attained with high fertilizer and tillage inputs under irrigation could be reasonable only in seasons with low precipitation (drought).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was positively associated with precipitation only under rain-fed cropping.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
precipitatione0
Setting
rain-fed croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive dependence between grain yield and precipitation was noticed only under rain-fed cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under unfavourable conditions, 330 kg ha -1 N:P:K and conventional tillage gave the highest yields.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
330 kg ha -1 of N:P:K fertilizer and conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
unfavourable conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yields were achieved with 330 kg ha -1 of N:P:K fertilizer and conventional tillage under unfavourable conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High inputs under irrigation increased yields.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
high inputse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Negative meteorological factors were diminished under irrigation, where high inputs resulted in increased yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate N:P:K inputs stabilized rain-fed maize yield despite lower yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
moderate inputs (330 kg ha -1 N:P:K)e0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
stabilitye0
Setting
rain-fed croppinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate inputs (330 kg ha -1 N:P:K) resulted in stability of the maize yield, regardless of the lower yields achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“rain-fed cropping is still the most abundant cropping practice in the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer and tillage inputs under irrigation may be reasonable only during drought seasons.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
high fertilizer and tillage inputs under irrigation could be reasonable only in seasons with low precipitation (drought)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high yields attained with high fertilizer and tillage inputs under irrigation could be reasonable only in seasons with low precipitation (drought)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.