Paper · 2016 · Plant and Soil

Valuing increased zinc (Zn) fertiliser-use in Pakistan

Edward J. M. Joy; Waqar Ahmad; Munir H. Zia; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
86
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Use of zinc (Zn) fertilisers may be cost-effective in increasing crop yields and in alleviating dietary Zn deficiency. However, Zn fertilisers are underutilised in many countries despite the widespread occurrence of Zn-deficient soils. Here, increased Zn fertiliser-use scenarios were simulated for wheat production in Punjab and Sindh Provinces, Pakistan. Inputs and outputs were valued in terms of both potential yield gains as well as health gains in the population. The current dietary Zn deficiency risk of 23.9 % in Pakistan was based on food supply and wheat grain surveys. “Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost” are a common metric of disease burden; an estimated 245,000 DALYs y−1 are lost in Punjab and Sindh due to Zn deficiency. Baseline Zn fertiliser-use of 7.3 kt y−1 ZnSO4.H2O was obtained from published and industry sources. The wheat area currently receiving Zn fertilisers, and grain yield responses of 8 and 14 % in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, were based on a recent survey of >2500 farmers. Increased grain Zn concentrations under Zn fertilisation were estimated from literature data and converted to improved Zn intake in humans and ultimately a reduction in DALYs lost. Application of Zn fertilisers to the area currently under wheat production in Punjab and Sindh, at current soil: foliar usage ratios, could increase dietary Zn supply from ~12.6 to 14.6 mg capita −1 d−1, and almost halve the prevalence of Zn deficiency, assuming no other changes to food consumption. Gross wheat yield could increase by 2.0 and 0.6 Mt. grain y−1 in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, representing an additional return of US$ >800 M and an annual increased grain supply of 19 kg capita −1. There are potential market- and subsidy-based incentives to increase Zn fertiliser-use in Pakistan. Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for yield alone are 13.3 and 17.5 for Punjab and Sindh, respectively. If each DALY is monetised at one to three fold Gross National Income per capita on purchasing power parity (GNIPPP), full adoption of Zn fertiliser for wheat provides an additional annual return of 405–1216 M International Dollars (I$) in Punjab alone, at a cost per DALY saved of I$ 461–619.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surveyed wheat grain yield response to Zn fertiliser was 8 in Punjab.

Treatment
Zn fertiliserse0
Outcome
grain yield responsese0
Value
8e0
Setting
Punjabe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat area currently receiving Zn fertilisers, and grain yield responses of 8 and 14 % in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, were based on a recent survey of >2500 farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surveyed wheat grain yield response to Zn fertiliser was 14 % in Sindh.

Treatment
Zn fertiliserse0
Outcome
grain yield responsese0
Value
14 %e0
Setting
Sindhe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat area currently receiving Zn fertilisers, and grain yield responses of 8 and 14 % in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, were based on a recent survey of >2500 farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Zn fertilisers across current wheat production could increase dietary Zn supply from ~12.6 to 14.6 mg capita −1 d−1.

Treatment
Application of Zn fertiliserse0
Outcome
dietary Zn supplye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
~12.6 to 14.6 mg capita −1 d−1e0
Setting
Punjab and Sindhe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn fertilisers to the area currently under wheat production in Punjab and Sindh, at current soil: foliar usage ratios, could increase dietary Zn supply from ~12.6 to 14.6 mg capita −1 d−1, and almost halve the prevalence of Zn deficiency, assuming no other changes to food consumption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Zn fertilisers across current wheat production could almost halve Zn deficiency prevalence.

Treatment
Application of Zn fertiliserse0
Outcome
prevalence of Zn deficiencye0
Direction
halvee0
Value
almost halvee0
Setting
Punjab and Sindhe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn fertilisers to the area currently under wheat production in Punjab and Sindh, at current soil: foliar usage ratios, could increase dietary Zn supply from ~12.6 to 14.6 mg capita −1 d−1, and almost halve the prevalence of Zn deficiency, assuming no other changes to food consumption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Gross wheat yield could increase by 2.0 in Punjab.

Treatment
zinc (Zn) fertiliser-uset0
Outcome
Gross wheat yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.0e0
Setting
Punjabe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gross wheat yield could increase by 2.0 and 0.6 Mt. grain y−1 in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, representing an additional return of US$ >800 M and an annual increased grain supply of 19 kg capita −1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“increased zinc (Zn) fertiliser-use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Gross wheat yield could increase by 0.6 Mt. grain y−1 in Sindh.

Treatment
zinc (Zn) fertiliser-uset0
Outcome
Gross wheat yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.6 Mt. grain y−1e0
Setting
Sindhe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gross wheat yield could increase by 2.0 and 0.6 Mt. grain y−1 in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, representing an additional return of US$ >800 M and an annual increased grain supply of 19 kg capita −1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“increased zinc (Zn) fertiliser-use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Increased gross wheat yield could provide an additional return of US$ >800 M.

Outcome
additional returne0
Value
US$ >800 Me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gross wheat yield could increase by 2.0 and 0.6 Mt. grain y−1 in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, representing an additional return of US$ >800 M and an annual increased grain supply of 19 kg capita −1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Increased gross wheat yield could add 19 kg capita −1 to annual grain supply.

Outcome
annual increased grain supplye0
Value
19 kg capita −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gross wheat yield could increase by 2.0 and 0.6 Mt. grain y−1 in Punjab and Sindh, respectively, representing an additional return of US$ >800 M and an annual increased grain supply of 19 kg capita −1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-only benefit-cost ratio for Zn fertiliser was 13.3 in Punjab.

Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for yield alonee0
Value
13.3e0
Setting
Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for yield alone are 13.3 and 17.5 for Punjab and Sindh, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1903 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat production in Punjab and Sindh Provinces, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–355 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-only benefit-cost ratio for Zn fertiliser was 17.5 in Sindh.

Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for yield alonee0
Value
17.5e0
Setting
Sindhe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for yield alone are 13.3 and 17.5 for Punjab and Sindh, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1903 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat production in Punjab and Sindh Provinces, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–355 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.